ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Acceptance and safety of the RSV-preventive treatment of newborns with nirsevimab in the maternity department: a prospective longitudinal cohort study in France.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of a single dose of nirsevimab against respiratory syncytial virus infection in infants: a meta-analysis and time-to-event analysis.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Acceptance of the respiratory syncytial virus infant monoclonal antibody nirsevimab among post-partum women in Italy.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Post-licensure safety of nirsevimab from the Canadian National Vaccine Safety (CANVAS) network.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Respiratory Pathogen Co-Detection in Hospitalized Infants with Bronchiolitis and Implementation of Universal Nirsevimab Immunoprophylaxis: A Six-Year Observational Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Parental Acceptance of Nirsevimab for RSV Prevention in Infants Across Two Consecutive Seasons in Emilia-Romagna, Italy.Vaccines · 2026Article
- Long-acting monoclonal antibodies and the evolving landscape of infant respiratory syncytial virus prevention.Pediatric investigation · 2026Article
- Coverage, Timing, Safety, and Determinants of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admission in Newborns Receiving Nirsevimab Prophylaxis for Respiratory Syncytial Virus.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Observational
- RSV Prophylaxis in Neonates: Implementation and Parental Acceptance during the First RSV Season in Germany.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2026Article
- Nirsevimab vs RSVpreF Vaccine for Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Related Hospitalization in Newborns.JAMA · 2026Article
- Systematic Review: Efficacy, Safety Profile, and Cost-Effectiveness of Nirsevimab Versus Palivizumab for RSV Prevention in Children Under 24 Months.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) antibody and small-molecule drugs: current status of clinical translation and challenges.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Prevention of Respiratory Infections in Children with Congenital Heart Disease: Current Evidence and Clinical Strategies.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Social media insights on the introduction of RSV immunoprophylaxis in Italy.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Respiratory syncytial virus immunization in children: The old, the new and what's just around the corner.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Review
- Diagnosis, management, and prevention of bronchiolitis in primary care: a survey of Italian family paediatricians.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Article
- Post-Marketing Surveillance of Nirsevimab: Safety Profile and Adverse Event Analysis from Spain's 2023-2024 RSV Immunisation Campaign.Vaccines · 2025Article
- Review
- Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Prevention: A Systematic Review.Vaccines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the acceptance and safety of the treatment of newborns with nirsevimab (a long-acting monoclonal antibody designed to prevent respiratory syncytial virus infections) during the first season of implementation. Methods: A longitudinal, prospective, single-centre cohort study was conducted from September 18th, 2023, to January 23rd, 2024 at Lille University Hospital (Lille, France). All newborns admitted to the hospital's maternity department during the study period and whose parents agreed to participate in the study were included. Parents were asked to state whether or not they agreed for their infant to receive nirsevimab. The occurrence of adverse events (AEs) 2 h after nirsevimab treatment and 7, 14 and 30 days after discharge was documented by the mother. The primary endpoint was the nirsevimab treatment acceptance rate. The secondary endpoints were the variables associated with the acceptance of nirsevimab, the reasons for accepting or refusing nirsevimab, and the treatment's real-life safety, relative to a non-treated control group of newborns. Findings: Of the 1730 infants born in the hospital during the study period, 477 met all the inclusion criteria and were enrolled. The nirsevimab acceptance rate [95% confidence interval] was 91.6% [89.1%-94.2%]. In a multivariable analysis, the mother's age, lower parity and having a partner in work were significantly associated with nirsevimab acceptance. The most common reason for accepting treatment was "to protect my baby", and the most common reason for refusing treatment was the lack of long-term data on nirsevimab. The nirsevimab and control groups did not differ significantly in terms of the types and frequencies of AEs. At least one serious AE was reported for 9.4% of the infants in the nirsevimab group and for 10.3% in the control group. None of the serious AEs were considered to be related to nirsevimab treatment. Interpretation: The nirsevimab acceptance rate for newborns in the maternity unit was high during the first season of implementation. The safety profile was very good, with no significant differences between the nirsevimab group and the control group. Funding: None.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.