Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39726646›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Development and validation of interpretable machine learning models for postoperative pneumonia prediction.

Bingbing Xiang, Yiran Liu, Shulan Jiao, Wensheng Zhang, Shun Wang, Mingliang Yi

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bingbing Xiang *Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yiran Liu *Nursing Department, Chengfei Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Shulan JiaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Wensheng ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Shun WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Clinical Medical College and The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China.
Mingliang YiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Affiliated Fifth People's Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pneumonia, a prevalent form of hospital-acquired pneumonia, poses significant risks to patients' prognosis and even their lives. This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for postoperative pneumonia in surgical patients using nine machine learning methods. Objective: Our study aims to develop and validate a predictive model for POP in surgical patients using nine machine learning algorithms. By evaluating the performance differences among these machine learning models, this study aims to assist clinicians in early prediction and diagnosis of POP, providing optimal interventions and treatments. Methods: Retrospective data from electronic medical records was collected for 264 patients diagnosed with postoperative pneumonia and 264 healthy control surgical patients. Through correlation screening, chi-square tests, and feature importance ranking, 47 variables were narrowed down to 5 potential predictive factors based on the main cohort of 528 patients. Nine machine learning models, including k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, random forest, decision tree, gradient boosting machine, adaptive boosting, naive bayes, general linear model, and linear discriminant analysis, were developed and validated to predict postoperative pneumonia. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating curve, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. A distribution plot of feature importance and feature interaction was obtained to interpret the machine learning models. Results: Among 17,190 surgical patients, 264 (1.54%) experienced postoperative pneumonia, which resulted in adverse outcomes such as prolonged hospital stay, increased ICU admission rates, and mortality. We successfully established nine machine learning models for predicting postoperative pneumonia in surgical patients, with the general linear model demonstrating the best overall performance. The AUC of the general linear model on the testing set was 0.877, with an accuracy of 0.82, specificity of 0.89, sensitivity of 0.74, precision of 0.88, and F1 score of 0.80. Our study revealed that the duration of bed rest, unplanned re-operation, end-tidal CO2, postoperative albumin, and chest X-ray film were significant predictors of postoperative pneumonia. Conclusion: Our study firstly demonstrated that the general linear model based on 5 common variables might predict postoperative pneumonia in the general surgical population.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPneumoniaPostoperative ComplicationsAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesmachine learningperioperative medicinepostoperative pneumoniaprediction modelrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID39726646
PMCPMC11670315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.