ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024
Psychometric evaluation of the abbreviated Hungarian Faking Orgasm Scale for Women.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emotion Regulation Difficulties and Sexual Motivation Associated with Faking Orgasm among Hungarian Women.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Faking Orgasm Scale for Women (FOS) was developed to explore the motivations behind women's self-reported instances of faking orgasm during oral sex and sexual intercourse. In a recent study, a Hungarian version of the FOS was developed, confirming the same factor structure as the original American version, consisting of four factors across two subscales. Methods: The current study aimed to develop and validate a brief Hungarian FOS. Factor analysis was conducted with data from 2220 women (mean age = 24.4, SD = 7.48 years). The Item Response Theory (IRT) analysis indicated that retaining four-four scales, each comprising of three items was the optimal solution for the revised shorter version. Validation involved 768 women (mean age = 22.6, SD = 4.54 years) completing a questionnaire package, including the Hungarian Short Form of Reasons for Having Sex Questionnaire (YSEX?-HSF) and Women's Sexual Working Models Scale (WSWMS). Results: The results suggest that the Hungarian 24-item FOS, with its four scales within each of the two sub-scales, provides a reliable and valid measurement of motives for faking orgasm in women. The different reasons behind faking orgasm are associated with different sexual working patterns and sexual motivations. Furthermore, women who reported faking orgasms reported significantly higher levels of sexual distancing and perceived lower care from their partners compared to women who reported not faking orgasms. Women who reported faking orgasm were also more likely to engage in sexual activities to attain personal goals and cope with emotional stress. Discussion: The FOS-24 offers both practitioners and researchers a concise and useful instrument for the assessment of faking orgasms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.