ArticleCureus2024
Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Lithium Disilicate Veneers Using Pre-heated Resin Composite With Two Conventional Resin Cements: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Truly Universal Dental Cements vs. Conventional Ones-Comparison of Mechanical Properties.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Preheated Composite for Prosthetic Cementation to Enamel and Dentin: A Scoping Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives This study aimed to compare the shear bond strength of three resin cements (light-cured resin cement, pre-heated composite resin, and dual-cured self-adhesive resin cement) when bonding to lithium disilicate discs. Materials and methods Thirty-six discs made of lithium disilicate were fabricated and etched with 9.5% (HF), and 36 human premolars were collected and immersed in the acrylic molds, then randomly divided into three equal groups (n = 12): Group 1: light-cured resin cement, Group 2: pre-heated resin composite, and Group 3: dual-cured resin cement. The resin composite was heated between 55°C and 65°C by a heater device. The shear bond strength test was performed using the general mechanical testing device. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests (p < 0.05). Results The highest shear bond strength was demonstrated by the light-cured resin cement group (26.61 ± 5.16 Mpa), followed by the dual-cured resin cement group (17.76 ± 4.67 Mpa), and the least by the pre-heated composite resin group (15.58 ± 3.36 MPa). The shear bond strength in the light-cured resin cement group was significantly higher than the dual-cured resin cement and pre-heated composite resin groups. Conclusion The light-cured resin cement has higher shear bond strength when compared to pre-heated resin composite and dual-cured resin cement with a self-etch system. Although pre-heating composite resins may increase its mechanical proprieties and make it suitable for luting ceramics it may not increase bond strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.