ArticleCureus2024
Cervical Cancer Screening in the United States Military Health System During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare systems implemented restrictions on in-person appointments to mitigate viral spread among healthcare workers and patients. This study assesses changes in cervical cancer screening (CCS) rates within the United States Military Health System (MHS) during this period. To date, no such data have been reported on COVID-19's effect on CCS within the MHS. Methods This retrospective cohort study compares CCS rates from the pandemic period of February 1, 2020, to February 28, 2022, to a pre-pandemic cohort spanning January 1, 2013, to January 31, 2020. Screening rates were analyzed using interrupted time series and regression methods. Results Results indicate a statistically significant decline in adequately screened patients, dropping from 77.9% (684,923 of 879,091 eligible patients) in January 2013 to 70.0% (457,109 of 652,507 eligible patients) in February 2021 (p<0.05). A statistically significant drop was also noted when comparing February 2020 (76.5%, 583,941 of 763,692 eligible patients) to February 2021 (70.0%, 457,109 of 652,507 eligible patients; p<0.05) and to February 2022 (72.3%, 496,100 of 686,029 eligible patients; p<0.05). The average pre-pandemic CCS rate of 75.5% significantly differed from the pandemic period's average of 73.3% (p<0.00001), representing 17,452 patients with inadequate screening during the pandemic. Conclusion This study highlights a substantial reduction in CCS within the MHS during the COVID-19 pandemic, aligning with national trends in cancer screening. It underscores the need for sustained healthcare access during crises and emphasizes the importance of planning to uphold essential preventative services. Future research should explore strategies to mitigate pandemic-related disruptions in cancer screening and their long-term implications on public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.