ReviewCureus2024
History of Renal Stone Surgery: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Hybrid endoscopic-robotic approaches for complex upper urinary tract disorders: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of micro-channel negative pressure sheath percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones: risk factors for postoperative complications.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Untreated obstruction of the urinary tract can result in urinary stasis, hydronephrosis, and infection, which in turn lead to tissue damage, chronic renal failure, and potentially death. Renal stones have afflicted humanity throughout history, with surgical approaches evolving significantly over time. This review explores the origins and major developments in surgical techniques for renal stones, enhancing our understanding of how modern procedures have evolved. These techniques were refined over time, driven by improved anatomical knowledge and surgical experimentation. The ancient perineal lithotomy remained a standard treatment until the late 19th century, when advancements in anesthesia and antisepsis emerged. These innovations allowed surgeons to attempt more ambitious procedures, aided by early methods for visualizing internal organs. In the 20th century, innovations in radiology, imaging technologies, and surgical instruments ushered in the era of minimally invasive surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.