ArticleCureus2024
Prevalence and Determinants of Vaccine Hesitancy Among Students at King Faisal University.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vaccination is a cornerstone of public health, providing immunity against various diseases. However, vaccine hesitancy, as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), poses a significant challenge to global health efforts. This cross-sectional study explores the prevalence and determinants of vaccine hesitancy among 401 students at King Faisal University. The sample primarily comprises young individuals (97.4% aged 18-24) and predominantly female participants (79%), with 90.5% residing in Al-Ahsaa. Our findings indicate that 75.4% of students adhere to the vaccination schedule, and 55.8% recognize the health benefits of vaccines. Notably, while 1.5% express skepticism, 45.8% strongly agree on the safety of vaccines, and 47.3% acknowledge their effectiveness. Interestingly, only 30.4% feel well-informed about vaccination recommendations, and 47.1% recognize the media's influence on vaccine hesitancy. A significant majority (68.5%) demonstrate high awareness, mainly relying on healthcare professionals (63.4%) for information. Concerns regarding side effects (58.8%) and doubts about vaccine efficacy (21.2%) are prevalent among participants. In conclusion, while the majority of students exhibit high knowledge levels and low hesitancy, concerns about side effects and trust in vaccine efficacy remain critical barriers. Targeted interventions are essential to enhance vaccine uptake and effectively address the factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.