ArticleCureus2024
Challenges With the Intolerance of Biologics in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: The Risk of Exacerbations Is Time-Dependent With the Rise of Eosinophils.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) can benefit from biologic therapy but some subjects may present an immune-mediated side effect. These patients will not meet the treatment goals and might have an increased risk of exacerbations. Monitoring these patients by determining blood eosinophil (BE) levels could be one of the tools that may allow a follow-up to prevent a worsening of asthma or exacerbations. The patient was a 50-year-old female with a diagnosis of SEA who had six asthma exacerbations in the last year. Baseline spirometry showed a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (L) of 0.80 with 34%p (z-score: -4.18) post bronchodilator (BD) and a BE count of 15% (1080 µL cells). After three doses of benralizumab, the spirometry showed an FEV1 (L) of 2.31 with 97%p (z-score: -0.21) post BD and a BE count of 0%. No exacerbations were reported while the patient received biologic medication, but it had to be stopped due to a dermatological allergic reaction. The patient was well-controlled for four months after stopping biologic medication and the BE count also increased, associated with two emergency visits due to exacerbations despite maintenance therapy. Although intolerance or hypersensitivity reactions to the treatment with biologics in asthmatic patients are rare, these patients must discontinue treatment, which increases their risk of exacerbations. In routine medical clinical practice, an easy approach can be made with the follow-up of an accessible and inexpensive test, i.e., the BE count. Its increments should trigger an alert for a closer follow-up and early therapy adjustments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.