Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39726410›Full record

ArticleMedeniyet medical journal2024

The Effect of Intradermal Injection with Two Different Injection Techniques on Pain and Functional Status in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain.

Sadiye Murat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medeniyet medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sadiye Muratİstanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine, Division of Rehabilitation, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-6544-7095

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different mesotherapy techniques applied at various dermal depths on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with non-specific neck pain. Methods: A total of 43 patients who received mesotherapy for non-specific neck pain were retrospectively analyzed. Patients treated with the point-by-point technique (n=21) and the napaj technique (n=22) were recorded. A mixture of 2 mL lidocaine and tenoxicam was used as the mesotherapy solution. Pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), functional status was assessed using the neck disability index (NDI), and quality of life was assessed using the Nottingham health profile before (T0), after (T1), and 3 months after (T2). Results: In both groups, which were homogeneous in terms of demographic data, statistically significant changes were observed in T1 and T2 values compared with T0 for all evaluation parameters (p=0.001). While both groups demonstrated improvement in all parameters, the posttreatment VAS and NDI score in the point-by-point group was slightly better than that in the napaj group (p=0.042), (p=0.043) but this difference disappeared in the 3-month evaluation. Conclusions: Mesotherapy using a lidocaine-tenoxicam mixture with both the point-by-point and napaj techniques is an effective and safe treatment method for nonspecific neck pain. Both techniques were found to be effective in improving pain, functional status, and quality of life, but neither technique was found to be superior to the other.

Indexed as

Intradermal injectionmesotherapynapajneck painpoint by point

Identifiers

PMID39726410
PMCPMC11683296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.