Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39726408›Full record

ArticleMedeniyet medical journal2024

The Serum Biomarkers in Ulcerative Colitis.

Semih Sezer, Selim Demirci, Melisa Irem Kara, Murat Korkmaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medeniyet medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Semih SezerHealth Sciences University Türkiye, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Gastroenterology, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-0458-1450
Selim DemirciHealth Sciences University Türkiye, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Gastroenterology, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0006-3024-3267
Melisa Irem KaraHealth Sciences University Türkiye, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Internal Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0005-9732-3416
Murat KorkmazHealth Sciences University Türkiye, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Gastroenterology, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9333-782X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: In this study, the aim was to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of more easily applicable and cost-effective serum biomarkers, such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-tolymphocyte ratio (PLR), C-reactive protein (CRP) to albumin ratio (CAR), and CRP-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR), instead of the endoscopic activity index (EAI) used to determine disease activation in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. Methods: Blood tests performed during the same period as colonoscopy were reviewed, and NLR, PLR, CAR, and CLR values were calculated. Based on the EAI score, patients with a score <4 were classified as having UC in remission, those with a score ≥4 as having active UC, and those with normal colonoscopy results as the control group. Results: The study included 66 patients with active UC, 31 with UC in remission, and 99 controls. The CLR and CAR values of active and remission UC patients were found to be higher compared with the control group (p<0.001), while no significant difference was found between the groups in terms of PLR and NLR values (p>0.05). The AUC calculated for CLR in diagnosing active UC was significant (p<0.001), and the best cut-off value was determined as >1,75. For CAR, the best cut-off value was calculated as >0.11. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the CLR and CAR had high sensitivity and specificity for detecting UC activity, whereas the PLR and NLR had low diagnostic value.

Indexed as

colonoscopyendoscopic activity indexinflammation markersUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID39726408
PMCPMC11683300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.