ArticleDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2025
Ceramide-based risk score CERT-1 improves risk prediction for overall mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with and without cardiovascular disease: A prospective cohort study.
Article in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sphingolipid Metabolism in Obesity: Bidirectional Regulation and Comparative Perspectives on Plant Sphingolipids.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Review
- Exploring Ceramide C16:0 as a Novel Biomarker and Therapeutic Target for Atherosclerosis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Review
- Sphingolipid Metabolism: A Pathological Hub Linking Lipid Dysregulation and Chronic Inflammation in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- From omics to AI-mapping the pathogenic pathways in type 2 diabetes.FEBS letters · 2025Review
- Ceramide-based risk score CERT-1 improves risk prediction for overall mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with and without cardiovascular disease: A prospective cohort study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsWhether the plasma-based ceramide-based risk score CERT1 improves risk prediction for cardiovascular disease (CVD) is uncertain. MATERIALS AND
methodsBaseline and follow-up data were combined from two cohorts, 334 patients with established/suspected CVD and 196 patients with type 2 diabetes followed for a median of 74 months (interquartile range 54-79 months). For the calculation of CERT1 risk score, we measured four specific plasma ceramides [Cer(d18:1/16:0), Cer(d18:1/18:0) and Cer(d18:1/24:1)] and their ratios to Cer(d18:1/24:0). Based on the CERT1 risk score, patients were split into four risk categories (low, moderate, increased or high risk). The primary outcome was a composite of overall mortality and incident nonfatal CVD outcomes (including myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke or permanent atrial fibrillation).
resultsOne hundred and thirty-nine patients developed the primary composite outcome (72 nonfatal CVD outcomes and 67 total deaths) during follow-up. Baseline CERT1 risk categories were significantly associated with the risk of developing the primary composite outcome (adjusted HR for high vs. low-risk category 2.43, 95% CI 1.39-4.22, p = 0.002, and adjusted HR for increased vs. low-risk category 2.16, 95% CI 1.28-3.63, p = 0.004). Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis showed that adding CERT1 risk score to traditional CVD risk factors and pre-existing CVD, improved the discriminatory capability of the regression model for predicting the primary composite outcome (AUROC 0.691 [95% CI 0.674-0.769] vs. 0.722 [95% CI 0.642-0.742], p = 0.0275).
conclusionsThe ceramide-based risk score CERT1 risk score improves risk prediction for long-term risk of overall mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with and without CVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.