Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39726147›Full record

ReviewPsyCh journal2025

Dual-System Collaborative Model of Prosocial Risky Behavior and Cognitive Computation: A Review.

Changlin Liu, Boqiang Zhao, Youlong Zhan, Ping Hu, Xiaoqin Mai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PsyCh journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Changlin LiuDepartment of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6301-2197
Boqiang ZhaoDepartment of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
Youlong ZhanDepartment of Psychology, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, China.
Ping HuDepartment of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
Xiaoqin MaiDepartment of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.

Funding

Fund for building world-class universities (disciplines) of Renmin University of China. ProjectNational Social Science Foundation of China (Major Program) 19ZDA021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prosocial risky behavior (PRB) refers to actions taken at personal risk for the benefit of others or societal welfare, combining risk-taking with prosocial intent, and involving the integrated processing of individual risk and social preferences. Building upon the review and evaluation of the definitions of PRB, existing research tools, theoretical models, and neural mechanisms, this paper elucidates the synergistic interaction and mechanisms of the emotional drive and cognitive reasoning systems in PRB. It constructs a dual-system collaborative model for PRB. Furthermore, to address the shortcomings of existing PRB research tools, such as limited cross-domain applicability and low reliability, this paper designs a PRB research paradigm within the economic decision-making domain. Combined with the dual-system collaborative model of PRB, this paper proposes a cognitive computational modeling concept for PRB and preliminarily verifies its reliability. Future research should conduct cross-cultural studies, utilizing cognitive neuroscientific technologies, to explore the cultural differences in the mechanisms underlying PRB, thereby enhancing the cross-cultural interpretive power of the constructed dual-system collaborative model of PRB. This broadens the theoretical explanatory pathways and research dimensions of PRB.

Indexed as

CognitionCooperative BehaviorModels, PsychologicalRisk-TakingSocial BehaviorDecision MakingHumanscognitive computationcross‐culturedual‐system collaborative modelprosocial risky behavior

Identifiers

PMID39726147
PMCPMC11961247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.