Trial reportJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
Is perioperative use of a combination of pregabalin and naproxen superior to naproxen only in reducing pain in ankle fractures? A prospective, randomized, multicenter study.
Trial report in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of Multimodal Pre-emptive Analgesia with Pregabalin Versus Naproxen on Post-Thoracotomy Pain and Opioid Consumption: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare the analgesic efficacy, adverse effects, and long-term functional outcomes of perioperative naproxen alone versus naproxen with pregabalin for treating pain in ankle fractures.
methodsThis study included 70 patients who underwent operative fixation of rotatory ankle fractures. Group A received naproxen 500 mg only, and Group B received naproxen 500 mg with pregabalin 75 mg 2-hour before surgery and 12 hourly for 14 days thereafter. The minimal clinically important difference of the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain was set at 1.8 out of 10. VAS for pain, opioid consumption, and any adverse effects were recorded for 3 days postoperatively. VAS for pain was checked at 2- and 6-weeks and 3- and 6-months, and functional outcomes were measured at 3- and 6-months postoperatively.
resultsSixty-three patients (33 and 30 in groups A and B, respectively) completed the 6-month follow-up. Demographic data were similar between groups. VAS for pain did not significantly differ between the groups at any timepoint up to 6 months (P ≥ 0.520), with 95% confidence intervals consistently within 1.8. No significant differences were observed between groups in opioid consumption and functional outcomes (P ≥ 0.211). In group B, dizziness at 48-hour and somnolence at 72-hour were significantly predominant (P ≤ 0.05).
conclusionOur study demonstrated comparable pain reduction between two groups following operative fixation of rotatory ankle fractures. However, side effects, including dizziness and somnolence, were predominant in Group B between 48 and 72 h.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.