ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
Distribution and gender-specific differences of coronal plane alignment of healthy knee.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- CPAK classification shows limited side-to-side agreement and limited reliability as a standalone surrogate for constitutional alignment in rheumatoid arthritis knees.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Alignment and/or ligament balancing? Towards truly personalized total knee arthroplasty-A narrative review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification in arthritic knees following robotic total knee arthroplasty.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- The Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee Classification in Patients With Medial Meniscal Posterior Root Tears.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Low bilateral consistency restricts the utility of the contralateral CPAK as a reliable reference for planning coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding optimal prosthesis alignment in TKA remains crucial despite ongoing debate. While current research focuses on osteoarthritic knees, a gap exists in characterizing healthy young adult knees in Asians. This study aims to fill this gap by identifying the distribution of CPAK phenotypes in this population, including potential gender variations and individual differences.
methodsA total of 390 knees from 195 young adults aged 20 to 35 years without knee pain who underwent hip-knee-ankle radiography were prospectively collected between February 2024 and March 2024. The average MPTA, LDFA, aHKA, and JLO were measured. The overall CPAK distribution was analyzed to assess gender variations and individual differences. On average, participants were 25.7 years old, 165.7 cm tall, and had a BMI of 23.6 kg/m². LDFA, MPTA, aHKA, and JLO averaged at 86.8°, 87.2°, 0.3°, and 174.0°, respectively.
resultsThis study demonstrates significant differences in knee alignment between men and women, as measured by the CPAK system. While zone II was the most common overall (43.3%), the distribution of CPAK zones varied by gender, with men exhibiting a higher prevalence of distal apex point alignments (89.9%) and women having a higher prevalence of CPAK zone V (18.3%). Finally, analysis of paired knees revealed a comparable zonal distribution for both genders (approximately 56%).
conclusionThis study examined CPAK distribution in young Asian adults without knee osteoarthritis and identified potential sex-based variations. The findings suggest a predominance of distally pointed CPAK (76.9%) and a possible benefit for slightly varus tibial cuts during TKA in this population for optimal joint alignment. Additionally, gender-specific considerations should be incorporated into knee alignment assessments and treatment planning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, A prospective descriptive study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.