ArticleBMC health services research2024
Barriers to quality cancer care: a qualitative exploration of oncology case managers' experiences in facilitating guideline implementation in Taiwan.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Applying quality indicators and multidisciplinary team care to improve long-term survival in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn cancer care, the use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) has been shown to improve the quality and effectiveness of medical services. To facilitate physicians' adherence to these guidelines, Taiwan established the position of oncology case manager (OCM) in 2010, one of whose responsibilities is to monitor physicians' compliance. However, there have been few explorations of their experiences and the barriers they face in facilitating guideline implementation.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to explore how OCMs carry out their roles in facilitating the implementation of CPGs in Taiwan and the challenges they encounter in this process.
methodsIn this study, a qualitative interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach focusing on interpreting phenomena was adopted. The subjects were eight OCMs from the same hospital in Taiwan. Data collection primarily involved conducting interviews, supplemented by document analysis.
resultsThe analysis revealed the following challenges for OCMs in the process of facilitating guideline implementation: (1) Local production: Self-directed exploration leads to significant pressure. (2) Operational modes: Difficulties arise in the "low-ranking overseeing high-ranking" approach. (3) Accountability mechanisms: OCMs are saddled with the chore of managing evaluation. CONCLUSION/PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Guidelines are vital tools to ensure the quality of cancer care. However, based on the experiences of OCMs, shortcomings in institutional design, hierarchical organizational culture, misconceptions about the role of OCMs, and a lack of support from management have been identified as key obstacles in the implementation process. Suggestions of ways to address these challenges and promote successful guideline implementation are proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.