ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2024
Azvudine efficacy in reducing mortality in COVID-19 patients.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strain-promoted azide-alkyne cycloaddition-based fluorometric detection of azvudine using DBCO-functionalized carbon dots.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Article
- COVID-19 Infection, Drugs, and Liver Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Mechanism and spectrum of inhibition of viral polymerases by 2'-deoxy-2'-β-fluoro-4'-azidocytidine or azvudine.NAR molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Advancing Parkinson's diagnosis: seed amplification assay for α-synuclein detection in minimally invasive samples.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSeveral therapeutic drugs have been authorized for the treatment of patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, further research on the mechanisms of action, efficacy, and target populations of these novel therapeutic drugs are necessary. This study included mild, moderate, severe, and critical COVID-19 patients to evaluate azvudine's effectiveness across different severity levels.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with COVID-19 admitted to our hospital from December 1, 2022, to March 31, 2023. Patients were divided into retrospective cohorts receiving azvudine antiviral therapy and standard treatment, and were followed-up for up to 28 days.
resultsPrior to data processing, azvudine treatment was associated with reduced mortality rates at 7 days (1.09/1000 persons vs. 5.06/1000 persons, P < 0.001) and 14 days (3.35/1000 persons vs. 5.65/1000 persons, P = 0.001). After propensity score matching, a decrease in mortality rates at 7 days (0.8/1000 persons vs. 6.29/1000 persons, P < 0.001), 14 days (3.42/1000 persons vs. 7.26/1000 persons, P < 0.001), and 28 days (4.33/1000 persons vs. 7.29/1000 persons, P = 0.003) were observed following azvudine treatment. After inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment, the results were consistent with propensity score matching. In the clinical subgroup analysis, azvudine treatment intervention significantly reduced the 7-day (2.49/1000 persons vs. 14.59/1000 persons, P = 0.001 and 11.36/1000 persons vs. 66.99/1000 persons, P < 0.001), 14-day (5.22/1000 persons vs. 17.36/1000 persons, P < 0.001 and 17.08/1000 persons vs. 51.72/1000 persons, P = 0.002), and 28-day (7.58/1000 persons vs. 16.02/1000 persons, P = 0.014 and 20.43/1000 persons vs. 46.51/1000 persons, P = 0.008) mortality rates in hospitalized patients with severe and critical COVID-19.
conclusionsThe study suggests that in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, azvudine treatment significantly reduces patient mortality rates in hospitalized COVID-19 infections, wherein the effects are more pronounced in severe and critical patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.