Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39725977›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2024

Barriers to PrEP use and adherence among adolescent girls and young women in Eastern, Southern, and Western Africa: a scoping review.

Metasebia Admassu, Christiana Nöstlinger, Bernadette Hensen

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Loss to Follow-Up and Visit Nonadherence in an HIV Incidence Cohort in Kisumu, Kenya.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Metasebia AdmassuDepartment of Public Health Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium. mjoffe@itg.be.
Christiana NöstlingerDepartment of Public Health Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Bernadette HensenDepartment of Public Health Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescent girls and young women (AGYW) are disproportionately affected by HIV. Globally, in 2022, an estimated 4000 AGYW 15-24 were newly infected with HIV weekly, and nearly 78% of these infections occurred in sub-Saharan Africa. Oral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is a key HIV prevention option within an overall HIV combination prevention approach with an efficacy of over 90% when taken correctly. However, uptake of and adherence to PrEP remains low, particularly among AGYW. This scoping review aims to map available evidence on factors that limit PrEP use among AGYW in Eastern, Southern, and Western African countries to inform research, policy, and practice on delivery of PrEP. Our review identified factors that affect PrEP journey among AGYW along the HIV prevention cascade.

methodsGuided by Arksey and O'Malley framework and using the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews, we searched the Web of Science, Global Health, and PubMed databases. Our review focused on oral PrEP, specifically papers reporting on barriers to PrEP experienced by AGYW, and peer-reviewed English-language articles published between 2012 and 2023.

resultsOf 1063 papers screened, 25 were included. Over half (60%) of the studies were qualitative; 72% were conducted in Kenya and South Africa. The barriers affecting motivation were, fear of side effects and pill burden, percieved low HIV risk, perceived stigma, PrEP use disapproval from parents and partners. PrEP access was limited by healthcare providers' stigma, isolated clinic setup, and lack of resources. Effective PrEP use was limited by a lack of parental or partner support, stigma, and lifestyle changes.

conclusionsAdolescent girls and young women face multiple and often intersecting barriers to effective PrEP use with stigma being a factor cross-cutting all steps of the prevention cascade. Similarly, lack of social support, reflected through disapproval and judgmental attitudes and low HIV risk perception, also affected two steps of the prevention cascade. Our review identified gaps in available evidence, with most studies conducted in only two countries and few quantitative studies available. Improving PrEP uptake and adherence requires interventions that address barriers across the cascade, with a particular focus on stigma and social support.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringHIV InfectionsMedication AdherencePre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdolescentAfrica, EasternAfrica, SouthernAfrica, WesternAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansSocial StigmaYoung AdultAnti-HIV AgentsAdherenceAdolescent girlsHIV preventionPrEPUptakeYoung women

Identifiers

PMID39725977
PMCPMC11670510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.