ReviewBMC surgery2024
Access to specialist plastic surgery in rural vs. Urban areas of Africa.
Review in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping Plastic Reconstructive Surgical Needs and Access Barriers in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Oncological Reconstruction of the Anterior Chest Wall in a Resource-limited Setting.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Global Perspectives in Plastic Surgery: The View From Ethiopia.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Scaling surgical care capacity in Nigeria: a narrative review of current practices and innovations in rural surgical workforce development.BMC surgery · 2025Review
- Exploring the burden of non-communicable diseases on surgical services in Africa: a comprehensive literature review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPlastic surgery is an essential yet underdeveloped field in many African nations, especially in rural areas. The demand for plastic surgery is increasing, but differences in access to respective services between rural and urban domiciles remain ever existent, despite the exponentiation of trauma, burns, and congenital disorders. According to this review, urban areas have access to better facilities and specialized surgeons, while rural areas frequently lack infrastructure, educated healthcare personnel, and medical resources. This review compares the quality and accessibility of plastic surgery services in African rural and urban settings in order to determine the variables influencing said differences in access.
methodsThis literature review was performed using electronic search databases comprising PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Africa Journals online (AJOL). Regional medical journals were also reviewed using keywords and associated Boolean operators pertaining to "plastic surgery", "plastic surgery in rural" and plastic surgery in urban" by selecting studies based on their relevance and content quality. Studies focusing on plastic surgery in Africa were included. A total of 37 articles were analyzed to provide insights into the disparities between rural and urban access to plastic surgery services in Africa. Studies not focusing on plastic surgery were excluded.
resultsThe review highlighted significant disparities in access to plastic surgery services between Africa's rural and urban areas. Rural areas usually lack medical resources, specialized surgeons, infrastructure, while urban areas have access to better facilities and specialized surgeons. Urban regions not only hail more training opportunities for surgeons but also foster further specialized facilities, greater training options, access to modern surgical equipment, sterile facilities and advanced instruments, contributing to clinical and surgical excellence alongside patient satisfaction and outcomes. However, there is a scarcity of qualified plastic surgeons in rural regions, including antiquated technology and a dearth of resources and expertise. Besides, socioeconomic variables that hinder said indifference between rural and urban areas, such as poverty, education, money, and cultural attitudes, precipitated limited access to critical surgical intervention in rural populations.
conclusionFurther research should be done on how plastic surgery services differ in urban and rural areas. Availability of financial expertise and specialists who can provide specialized care in rural settings is recommended. To enhance patient outcomes, the implementation of technological innovation, improved healthcare infrastructure, and effective training initiatives should be implemented in rural Africa. Also, in the field of plastic surgery, emphasizing the use of telemedicine and mobile surgical units may aid universal healthcare for residents in rural domiciles. Significant progress towards ensuring equitable access to high-quality plastic surgery in rural Africa may be achieved through these initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.