ArticleBMC oral health2024
Endodontic emergency patients' profile and treatment outcome - a prospective cohort study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Follow-Up After Urgent Endodontic Care: A Retrospective Exploratory Study in a University Clinic.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundToothache is a debilitating condition, often with mild to excruciating pain, swelling, eating difficulties and insomnia. This study aims to delineate the profiles of patients seeking emergency dental care, focusing on the diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes following non-surgical root canal treatment.
methodsThis prospective cohort study was conducted from 2012 to 2021 at the Section for Endodontics, Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Norway. A total of 281 emergency patient forms were analyzed. Data registered included patient demographics, dental history, chief complaints, medications used, diagnostic results, treatments provided and outcome.
resultsA total of 272 patients (272 teeth) were included in the study. Pain was the predominant complaint (98.5%), where only 57.4% of the patients managed to localize pain to a specific tooth. The mean age of patients was 51.2 years with no significant gender differences. The maxillary right first molar (15.4%) was the most frequent tooth needing treatment. The majority of the patients had experienced pain for three days before they attended the emergency appointment. The most frequently used drug for pain management was paracetamol which was stated to have little effect. Teeth that needed endodontic treatment often had restorations rather than caries. The most frequent diagnoses were pulpitis (26.8%) followed by necrotic pulp (25.4%) and previously root filled teeth (22.8%). Root canal treatment was performed on 60% of the teeth and a success rate of 95% was registered at one-year recall.
conclusionsThere was no singular diagnostic cause leading patients to seek an emergency appointment, highlighting the necessity of a thorough diagnostic procedure. Over the counter pain medications have little effect on alleviating dental pain, often resulting in desperate measures of self-medication. 60% of the teeth needing emergency treatment had previous coronal restorations such as fillings or crowns, indicating that conservative treatment does not appear to fully protect against future pulpal disease. The good prognosis of root canal treatment for teeth with acute symptoms supports recommending dentists to attempt root canal treatment rather than opting for tooth extraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.