Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39725949›Full record

ReviewBMC primary care2024

PSA testing in primary care: is it time to change our practice?

Frederique Beatrice Denijs, Hendrik Van Poppel, Arnulf Stenzl, Tiago Villanueva, Josep Maria Vilaseca, Mehmet Ungan, André Deschamps, Sarah Collen, Monique J Roobol

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment in Prostate Cancer.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Frederique Beatrice DenijsDepartment of Urology, Erasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Hendrik Van PoppelDepartment of Urology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. hendrik.vanpoppel@kuleuven.be.
Arnulf StenzlDepartment of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Tiago VillanuevaReynaldo Dos Santos Family Health Unit, Póvoa de Santa Iria, Portugal.
Josep Maria VilasecaDepartment of Primary Healthcare, Althaia Foundation, Clinical and University Network, Manresa, Catalonia, Spain.
Mehmet UnganWorld Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA- Europe) and Department of Family Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
André DeschampsEuropa Uomo, Antwerp, Belgium.
Sarah CollenEuropean Association of Urology, Brussels, Belgium.
Monique J RoobolDepartment of Urology, Erasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistorical prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening studies reduced prostate cancer-related deaths but also led to overdiagnosis/overtreatment. Since then, opportunistic PSA testing has increased, and late-stage diagnoses and prostate-cancer related deaths are rising.

objectivesTo review current trends regarding PSA testing in primary care and propose a collaborative approach to improve early prostate cancer detection. DISCUSSION: Opportunistic PSA testing patterns vary among General Practitioners (GPs) and Family Doctors (FDs) based on differing guidelines, patient pressure, time constraints and personal views/preferences. However, an organised, risk-adapted strategy, as outlined by the European Association of Urology's guidelines, could facilitate the early diagnosis of significant prostate cancer whilst sparing those unlikely to experience disease-related symptoms from further tests (overdiagnosis) as well as the psychosocial consequences of a cancer diagnosis. This could be achieved by the introduction of national prostate cancer screening programmes, which has been endorsed in the European Commission's publication of the EU Cancer Screening Recommendations. In this scenario, GPs/FDs would still play an important role in supporting men throughout the decision pathway. However, as some men may still request a PSA test from their GP/FD, patient information as well as clear guidance and support to GPs/FDs are needed, including appropriate skills training to facilitate effective counselling and informed decision-making, and the use of risk calculators to inform referral decisions.

conclusionGPs/FDs play an important role in counselling healthy men eligible to consider PSA testing. However, clear guidance, training and support is required for them to assume this role.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPrimary Health CareProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleMass ScreeningPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prostate-Specific AntigenPrimary careProstate cancerProstate-specific antigenScreening

Identifiers

PMID39725949
PMCPMC11670451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.