ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024
Deep learning-based metabolomics data study of prostate cancer.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- SEFA: Semantic Embedding-Based Feature Augmentation of Biomedical Language-Model Embeddings Improves Interpretable Metabolomic Prediction of Lung Cancer.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Machine learning-driven cancer diagnostics with improved robustness and interpretability.Chemical science · 2026Review
- Metabolomics Analysis Based on UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS to DiscriminateFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Identification of biomarkers for non-invasive diagnosis and risk stratification in prostate cancer using NMR-based metabolomics and machine learning.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As a heterogeneous disease, prostate cancer (PCa) exhibits diverse clinical and biological features, which pose significant challenges for early diagnosis and treatment. Metabolomics offers promising new approaches for early diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of PCa. However, metabolomics data are characterized by high dimensionality, noise, variability, and small sample sizes, presenting substantial challenges for classification. Despite the wide range of applications of deep learning methods, the use of deep learning in metabolomics research has not been extensively explored. In this study, we propose a hybrid model, TransConvNet, which combines transformer and convolutional neural networks for the classification of prostate cancer metabolomics data. We introduce a 1D convolution layer for the inputs to the dot-product attention mechanism, enabling the interaction of both local and global information. Additionally, a gating mechanism is incorporated to dynamically adjust the attention weights. The features extracted by multi-head attention are further refined through 1D convolution, and a residual network is introduced to alleviate the gradient vanishing problem in the convolutional layers. We conducted comparative experiments with seven other machine learning algorithms. Through five-fold cross-validation, TransConvNet achieved an accuracy of 81.03% and an AUC of 0.89, significantly outperforming the other algorithms. Additionally, we validated TransConvNet's generalization ability through experiments on the lung cancer dataset, with the results demonstrating its robustness and adaptability to different metabolomics datasets. We also proposed the MI-RF (Mutual Information-based random forest) model, which effectively identified key biomarkers associated with prostate cancer by leveraging comprehensive feature weight coefficients. In contrast, traditional methods identified only a limited number of biomarkers. In summary, these results highlight the potential of TransConvNet and MI-RF in both classification tasks and biomarker discovery, providing valuable insights for the clinical application of prostate cancer diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.