ArticleBMC public health2024
Child mortality in Eastern Ethiopia: acceptability of Postmortem minimally invasive tissue sampling in a predominantly muslim community.
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIt is crucial to consider cultural, religious, and socio-behavioural factors that may influence the acceptability of Minimally Invasive Tissues Sampling (MITS). MITS is being used to understand the causes of child death and conducted in nine countries within Africa and South Asia with the highest child mortality. Progress has been made in the development of laboratory infrastructures and training for physicians to do MITS, but many communities are concerned about the religious acceptability of taking samples from deceased children. This paper explores the acceptability of MITS in a predominantly Muslim community.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted in Kersa and Harar, in Eastern Ethiopia between April 23, 2018 and April 21, 2019 where high child mortality rates have been recorded. The study involved interviews and focus groups with 76 participants, including mothers, elders, and religious leaders. In addition, observations were conducted at burial ceremonies and in grieving families' homes. Grounded theory framework is used in this article to understand the acceptability of postmortem MITS.
resultsWe explore cultural, religious, and socio-behavioural barriers and facilitators that may influence the acceptability of minimally invasive tissue sampling. We identify three themes relating to the acceptability of MITS: (1) Perceptions and rituals related to child death (2), Religious acceptance of post-mortem investigation, and (3) Fears and suspicions of organ theft and body mutilation. Most participants hypothetically accepted MITS, but suggested that the procedure consider religious practices. Religious leaders and parents stated that they would accept the procedure if it would help reduce child deaths. Acceptance is inconsistent and differs across time and place. Some villages accepted the procedure swiftly, only to change their views when they became aware of suspicions from other villages about the procedure disfiguring the body. Parents of deceased children were concerned that taking samples from the children's bodies would delay the burial.
conclusionsMortality surveillance requires a thorough understanding of the cultural, religious, and sociocultural aspects that may affect the acceptability of MITS. MITS research should be conducted close to communities, involving community members, incorporating religious perspectives, and promoting health outreach campaigns to facilitate sociocultural perceptions of the research activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.