ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024
Uncertain significance and molecular insights of CPLANE1 variants in prenatal diagnosis of Joubert syndrome: a case report.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Complementary role of echocardiography, karyotyping, and chromosomal microarray in congenital cardiac anomalies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrenatal whole exome sequencing (WES) is becoming an increasingly used diagnostic tool for fetuses with structural anomalies. However, the identification of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in clinically relevant genes can significantly complicate prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling. CASE PRESENTATION: A fetus conceived through in vitro fertilization at the third attempt presented with polydactyly and molar tooth sign at 24 + 6 weeks of gestation. Trio-based WES was performed on both parents and the affected fetus, revealing a pair of compound heterozygous CPLANE1 variants (c.4646 A > T/p.Glu1549Val and c.1233 C > A/p.Tyr411*) potentially associated with Joubert syndrome. According to the ACMG guidelines, one of the biallelic variants was classified as VUS, and the other as pathogenic. However, these variants had no allele frequencies in the general population. The p.Tyr411* variant was classified as deleterious, while the p.Glu1549Val variant was located in highly conserved residues, was predicted to be damaging by in silico tools, and altered hydrogen bonding. Furthermore, CPLANE1 expression was highest in the brain during the embryonic and fetal stages. These findings provide additional support for the association between CPLANE1 variants in this fetus and Joubert syndrome. Thus, the most likely diagnosis was Joubert syndrome, and after careful consideration, the couple decided to terminate the pregnancy.
conclusionThe expression patterns of CPLANE1 and the molecular effects of the variants may provide further evidence supporting the potential for prenatal diagnosis of Joubert syndrome in the case of biallelic VUS and pathogenic variant. This study suggests that molecular insights may play a role in interpreting VUS in clinically relevant prenatal genes for prenatal diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.