Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39725883›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Differences between neonatal units with high and low rates of breast milk feeding for very preterm babies at discharge: a qualitative study of staff experiences.

Jenny McLeish, Annie Aloysius, Chris Gale, Maria Quigley, Jennifer J Kurinczuk, Fiona Alderdice

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jenny McLeishNIHR Policy Research Unit in Maternal and Neonatal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK. jenny.mcleish@npeu.ox.ac.uk.
Annie AloysiusDepartment of Neonatology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Chris GaleNeonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, SW10 9NH, UK.
Maria QuigleyNIHR Policy Research Unit in Maternal and Neonatal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
Jennifer J KurinczukNIHR Policy Research Unit in Maternal and Neonatal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
Fiona AlderdiceNIHR Policy Research Unit in Maternal and Neonatal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme PR-PRU-1217-21202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast milk has significant benefits for preterm babies, but 'very preterm' babies are unable to feed directly from the breast at birth. Their mothers have to initiate and sustain lactation through expressing milk for tube feeding until their babies are developmentally ready to feed orally. There are wide disparities between neonatal units in England in rates of breast milk feeding at discharge. This study explored health professionals' experiences of barriers and facilitators to their role in supporting breast milk feeding and breastfeeding for very preterm babies.

methods12 health professionals were interviewed, from four neonatal units in England with high or low rates of breast milk feeding at discharge. Interviews were analysed using comparative thematic analysis.

resultsFive themes were developed: 'The role of the infant feeding specialist', 'Achieving a whole team approach to breast milk feeding', 'Supporting initiation of breastfeeding' 'Supporting long-term expressing', 'Supporting the transition to breastfeeding'. There were notable differences between neonatal units in the time allocated to specialist feeding support, the team's sense of collective responsibility for supporting feeding, leadership, the use of external standards as levers for change, and training for the multi-disciplinary team. The feeding challenges faced by mothers of very preterm babies could be made worse where there was no joined-up working between neonatal and postnatal staff; inadequate facilities for mothers to stay with their babies; and when opportunities were missed to give information about the importance of early initiation of expressing and to support mothers' confidence during the transition to direct breastfeeding.

conclusionsEffective support can be influenced by having a supernumerary post dedicated to infant feeding; strong leadership that champions breast milk feeding and breastfeeding within Family Integrated Care; maintaining accountability by using existing quality improvement tools and accredited standards for neonatal units; and training for the whole multi-disciplinary team that encourages and enables every member of staff to take an appropriate share of responsibility for consistently informing and assisting mothers with expressing and breastfeeding. Joined-up working between staff on antenatal and postnatal wards and neonatal units is important to enable integrated feeding support for the mother-baby dyad.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingIntensive Care Units, NeonatalPatient DischargeQualitative ResearchAttitude of Health PersonnelEnglandFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMothersPatient Care TeamBarriersBreastfeedingExpressingFacilitatorsFamily integrated careNeonatal unitQualitativeStaff experiencesVery preterm

Identifiers

PMID39725883
PMCPMC11673894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.