Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39725880›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2024

Detection of a novel DNA methylation marker panel for esophageal cancer diagnosis using circulating tumor DNA.

Yan Zheng, Wenqun Xing, BingWei, Xianben Liu, Guanghui Liang, Dongfeng Yuan, Ke Yang, Weizhen Wang, Dongxu Chen, Jie Ma

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07266363 (SYNERGY Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07266363 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

SYNERGY Study: Early Detection Through Integrated Evaluation of Cell-Free and Exosomal microRNAs for Biomarker-Guided Screening of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

TypeobservationalSponsorCity of Hope Medical CenterRan2025 to 2028Enrolled600ConditionsESCCArmsSmall RNA sequencing of exo- and cf-miRNAs, RT-qPCR quantification of cf- and exo-miRNAs (SYNERGY assay), PCR-based validation (SYNERGY assay)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yan Zheng *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Wenqun Xing *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
BingWeiDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, No 127, Dongming Road, Zhengzhou, 450008, Henan, China.
Xianben LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Guanghui LiangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Dongfeng YuanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Ke YangDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, No 127, Dongming Road, Zhengzhou, 450008, Henan, China.
Weizhen WangDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, No 127, Dongming Road, Zhengzhou, 450008, Henan, China.
Dongxu ChenDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, No 127, Dongming Road, Zhengzhou, 450008, Henan, China.
Jie MaDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, No 127, Dongming Road, Zhengzhou, 450008, Henan, China. majie_fzbl@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophageal cancer (ECa) is one of the most deadly cancers, with increasing incidence worldwide and poor prognosis. While endoscopy is recommended for the detection of ECa in high-risk individuals, it is not suitable for large-scale screening due to its invasiveness and inconvenience.

methodsIn this study, a novel gene methylation panel was developed for a blood-based test, and its diagnostic efficacy was evaluated using a cohort of 304 participants (203 cases, 101 controls). The assessment focused on the DNA methylation levels of SEPTIN9, tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2 (TFPI2), and the fragile histidine triad gene (FHIT) in patients with ECa, benign esophageal disease, and healthy controls. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated for the panel to calculate the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), along with a comparison to the gold standard of pathological examination. The consistency between biomarker and pathological diagnosis was evaluated with kappa analysis conducted with IBM SPSS Statistics. The Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was utilized to assess the association of test positivity with demographic characteristics.

resultsIn patients with ECa, SEPTIN9, TFPI2, and FHIT DNA methylation levels were significantly higher compared to those with benign esophageal disease or healthy controls. The panel demonstrated promising potential as a noninvasive tool for distinguishing malignant tumors from both healthy controls and benign esophageal diseases, achieving an area under the ROC curve of 0.925 (95% CI: 0.889-0.952), with a sensitivity of 79.8% [95% CI 73.6-85.1%] and specificity of 95.0% [95% CI 88.8-98.4%]. In particular, the panel showed exceptional diagnostic efficiency for stage 0, I, and II cancer patients with sensitivity at 69.0, 75.5%, and 78.9%, respectively. The comparison revealed a Kappa value of 0.725 between RT-PCR testing and the established gold standard of pathological examination, indicating a high level of consistency. Additionally, there was no bias in diagnostic efficiency based on age, gender, or the presence of other malignancies (non-esophageal cancers).

conclusionsThe study's findings suggested that the DNA methylation biomarkers panel holds promise as a non-invasive and convenient diagnostic test for ECa. The panel's ability to distinguish malignant tumors from benign esophageal diseases, coupled with its high sensitivity and specificity, presented opportunities to enhance the over-all diagnosis of high-risk population when in conjunction with existing detection methods.

Indexed as

Acid Anhydride HydrolasesBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNADNA MethylationEsophageal NeoplasmsNeoplasm ProteinsSeptinsAdultAgedBis(5'-adenosyl)triphosphataseCase-Control StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGlycoproteinsHumansMaleAcid Anhydride HydrolasesBiomarkers, TumorBis(5'-adenosyl)triphosphataseCirculating Tumor DNAGlycoproteinsNeoplasm ProteinsSEPTIN9 protein, humanSeptinstissue-factor-pathway inhibitor 2Circulating tumor DNADNA methylationEsophageal cancerLiquid biopsyNoninvasive detection

Identifiers

PMID39725880
PMCPMC11670433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.