Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39725841›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026

Impact of cancer during reproductive age on the probability of livebirth after cancer: a register-based cohort study among Danish women aged 18-39 with and without cancer.

Line Bentsen, Lotte Berdiin Colmorn, Helle Pappot, Kirsten Tryde Macklon, Ditte Vassard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Fertility in breast cancer survivorship: a scoping review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Line BentsenDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. Line.Bentsen.01@regionh.dk.
Lotte Berdiin ColmornFertility Clinic, Department of Gynaecology, Fertility and Childbirth, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Helle PappotDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kirsten Tryde MacklonFertility Clinic, Department of Gynaecology, Fertility and Childbirth, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ditte VassardFertility Clinic, Department of Gynaecology, Fertility and Childbirth, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis register-based study investigates the probability of a livebirth after cancer during the female reproductive age.

methodsThe study population, derived from the DANAC II cohort, included women aged 18-39 diagnosed with cancer between 1978 and 2016, matched with 60 undiagnosed women each from the general population. Primary outcome was a livebirth after cancer with follow-up until death, emigration, or end of follow-up. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using multivariable Cox regression analyses.

resultsThe population included 21,596 women with cancer and 1,295,760 without. The 20-year cumulative incidence of livebirth after cancer/study entry was lower among women with cancer (0.22 [95% CI 0.22-0.22]) compared to those without (0.34 [95% CI 0.34-0.34]). The HR of a livebirth after cancer was 0.61 [95% CI 0.59-0.63]; highest at age 18-25 (HR = 0.72 [95% CI 0.68-0.76]); and lowest at age 33-39 (HR = 0.50 [95% CI 0.47-0.54]). Nullipara women had higher HR of a livebirth than those with children (HR = 0.72 [95% CI 0.69-0.75] vs. HR = 0.48 [95% CI 0.46-0.51]). HR was lowest for women with breast, gynecological, central-nerve-system cancer, and leukemia. Women with/without cancer were comparable in assisted reproductive technology initiation after cancer/study entry, but HR was higher among nullipara than in those with prior children.

conclusionsCancer during reproductive years significantly and negatively impacts HR of a livebirth after cancer, particularly as age at diagnosis increases. Low HR of livebirth is observed in specific cancer groups. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Results underscore the importance of oncofertility counseling at diagnosis, referral to fertility specialist before treatment, and follow-up after cancer, focusing on cancer type, parity status, and age at diagnosis.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsLive BirthNeoplasmsAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansPregnancyRegistriesYoung AdultCancerEpidemiologyFertilityLivebirthYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID39725841
PMCPMC13144227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.