ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025
Sequence order resolves ambiguity in a nonlinguistic visual categorization task.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Verbal recoding underlies visual ambiguity resolution, even in a nonlinguistic context.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When we encounter an unfamiliar word in a sentence, word order can be used to determine the grammatical category to which that word belongs and clarify ambiguity. However, it is unclear whether a similar categorization effect occurs in nonlinguistic contexts. We created three perceptually distinct categories of shape stimuli-rounded (A); squared (B); pointed (C). Participants were first taught to categorize these shapes, then participants in the experimental condition were trained to select them in a fixed sequence order (A→ B → C) while participants in the control condition were allowed to select them in any order. We then generated ambiguous stimuli by morphing shapes from different categories together. In the experimental condition, when an ambiguous morph was presented in a sequence, its subsequent categorization radically shifted based on which shape it replaced. For example, when an AB morph replaced the A shape in a sequence, it was more likely to be categorized as A. By contrast, participants in the control condition, who selected these stimuli without a fixed sequence order, showed no effect, demonstrating the critical role of sequence order and ruling out alternative explanations. These results demonstrate that, even using nonlinguistic stimuli, the position in which an ambiguous stimulus occurs in a sequence drastically impacts how it is subsequently categorized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39725817What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.