Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39725788›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2024

Effects of static stretching and specific warm-up on the repetition performance in upper- and lower-limb exercises in resistance-trained older women.

Felipe Lisboa, Witalo Kassiano, Natã Stavinski, Bruna Costa, Gabriel Kunevaliki, Jarlisson Francsuel, Ian Tricoli, Aline Prado, Leticia T Cyrino, Marcelo A S Carneiro and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Felipe LisboaMetabolism, Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, State University of Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia, km 380, Londrina, 86057-970, Brazil. felipe.lisboa7@uel.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8733-3889
Witalo KassianoMetabolism, Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, State University of Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia, km 380, Londrina, 86057-970, Brazil.
Natã StavinskiMetabolism, Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, State University of Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia, km 380, Londrina, 86057-970, Brazil.
Bruna CostaMetabolism, Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, State University of Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia, km 380, Londrina, 86057-970, Brazil.
Gabriel KunevalikiMetabolism, Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, State University of Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia, km 380, Londrina, 86057-970, Brazil.
Jarlisson FrancsuelMetabolism, Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, State University of Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia, km 380, Londrina, 86057-970, Brazil.
Ian TricoliMetabolism, Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, State University of Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia, km 380, Londrina, 86057-970, Brazil.
Aline PradoMetabolism, Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, State University of Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia, km 380, Londrina, 86057-970, Brazil.
Leticia T CyrinoMetabolism, Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, State University of Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia, km 380, Londrina, 86057-970, Brazil.
Marcelo A S CarneiroMetabolism, Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, State University of Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia, km 380, Londrina, 86057-970, Brazil.
Luis LimaMetabolism, Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, State University of Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia, km 380, Londrina, 86057-970, Brazil.
Pâmela Castro-E-SouzaMetabolism, Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, State University of Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia, km 380, Londrina, 86057-970, Brazil.
Edilaine F CavalcanteMetabolism, Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, State University of Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia, km 380, Londrina, 86057-970, Brazil.
Abdallah AchourMetabolism, Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, State University of Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia, km 380, Londrina, 86057-970, Brazil.
Edilson S CyrinoMetabolism, Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, State University of Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia, km 380, Londrina, 86057-970, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPreparation methods are often used to improve performance (e.g., number of repetitions) within the resistance training session. However, there is still no consensus in the scientific literature on whether there is a superior preparation method for improving performance, particularly in older adults.

methodsWe compared the effects of preparation by specific warm-up (SW), static stretching (SS), and control condition (CC) on the total number of repetitions in four exercises: leg extension, triceps pushdown, seated leg curl, and preacher curl. Fifty-seven older women (≥ 60 years) performed the experimental protocols (SW and SS) and the CC in a cross-over and counterbalanced design. Following the preparation protocol, the main exercises were performed in two sets until volitional concentric failure, with a two-minute rest interval between sets and 2-3 min between exercises. The main outcome was the total number of repetitions.

resultsThe SS improved performance compared to the SW and the CC in the leg extension and seated leg curl resistance exercises. In contrast, the SW impaired performance compared to the SS and CC in the triceps pushdown and preacher curl exercises.

conclusionOur results suggest that SS may improve performance in lower-limb exercises, while the SW appears to negatively affect performance in upper-limb exercises in resistance-trained older women.

Indexed as

Lower ExtremityMuscle Stretching ExercisesResistance TrainingUpper ExtremityWarm-Up ExerciseAgedCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthAgingMotor performanceSingle joint exercisesStrength training

Identifiers

PMID39725788
PMCPMC11671542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.