Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39725675›Full record

ArticleAlcohol, clinical & experimental research2025

Assessing initial/early aversion-resistant drinking across male and female alcohol-preferring and non-preferring rats.

Kari M Haines, Nicholle E Smith, Cristine L Czachowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcohol, clinical & experimental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kari M HainesAddiction Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Indiana Alcohol Research Center, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Nicholle E SmithAddiction Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Indiana Alcohol Research Center, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4288-0504
Cristine L CzachowskiAddiction Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Indiana Alcohol Research Center, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Funding

Translational Research and Science Education (OUT)P60AA007611 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI Marian Lee Logrip · 2003 to 2026
$45.5M
TRAINING GRANT ON GENETICS ASPECTS OF ALCOHOLISMT32AA007462 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CRISTINE L CZACHOWSKI · 1985 to 2026
$10.7M
NIAAA NIH HHS P60-007611NIAAA NIH HHS T32-007462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne trait of alcohol use disorder (AUD) is continuing to drink despite negative consequences. The current study investigated initial/early aversion-resistant drinking (ARD) across selectively bred alcohol-preferring lines to assess aversion resistance with minimal ethanol history and subsequent ethanol-seeking and drinking profiles. Additionally, ARD was assessed in alcohol-preferring and non-preferring rats using a sucrose reinforcer to determine if ARD may be a genetic risk factor for AUD.

methodsMale and female alcohol-preferring rats were given four concentrations of quinine (0.03, 0.10, 0.30, and 1.00 g/L-in random order) in an ethanol solution in the homecage for 30 min daily across 12 days. Seeking and drinking were then assessed in the operant chambers. Additional groups of alcohol-preferring and non-preferring rats were given access to the same concentrations of quinine-adulterated sucrose using the same daily, random-order presentation.

resultsIn ethanol, all preferring lines performed similarly, showing resistance to quinine at the lowest concentration. In the homecage, high-alcohol-drinking (HAD)1 rats drank high levels of ethanol similar to alcohol-preferring (P) rats, whereas in an operant task were more similar to the HAD2 rats. In sucrose, P and HAD2 rats were shown to be aversion resistant at low concentrations of quinine compared to baseline. Overall, the non-preferring lines all demonstrated sensitivity to quinine-adulterated sucrose.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates alcohol-preferring lines show similar ARD when ethanol is the reinforcer. Regarding motivated responding, P rats show high-seeking and drinking behaviors as previously observed. In the homecage, HAD1 rats drink similarly to P rats indicating that different conditions (i.e., free vs. operant access) influence drinking behaviors between these lines. Importantly, in a sucrose reinforcer, alcohol-preferring rats are more aversion-resistant than non-preferring lines, while non-preferring lines show high sensitivity to aversion, suggesting an overall tendency to demonstrate a low level of compulsive behavior.

Indexed as

alcoholaversion‐resistant drinkingcompulsive drinkingquininerat

Identifiers

PMID39725675
PMCPMC11828967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.