Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39725468›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM2025

Perceptions of Medically Complex Patients Enrolled in an Ambulatory Intensive Care Unit at a Healthcare-for-the-Homeless Clinic.

Brian Chan, Elizabeth Hulen, Samuel T Edwards, Anna Geduldig, Meg Devoe, Christina Nicolaidis, P Todd Korthuis, Somnath Saha

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brian ChanFrom the Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Addiction Medicine Section, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR (BC, STE, MD, CN, PTK); Central City Concern, Portland OR (BC, AG, MD); Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland OR (EH, STE, SS); School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland OR (AG, CN); School of Social Work, Portland State University, Portland OR (CN); School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University and Portland State University, Portland OR (PTK); Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (SS). chanbri@ohsu.edu.
Elizabeth HulenFrom the Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Addiction Medicine Section, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR (BC, STE, MD, CN, PTK); Central City Concern, Portland OR (BC, AG, MD); Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland OR (EH, STE, SS); School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland OR (AG, CN); School of Social Work, Portland State University, Portland OR (CN); School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University and Portland State University, Portland OR (PTK); Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (SS).
Samuel T EdwardsFrom the Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Addiction Medicine Section, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR (BC, STE, MD, CN, PTK); Central City Concern, Portland OR (BC, AG, MD); Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland OR (EH, STE, SS); School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland OR (AG, CN); School of Social Work, Portland State University, Portland OR (CN); School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University and Portland State University, Portland OR (PTK); Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (SS).
Anna GeduldigFrom the Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Addiction Medicine Section, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR (BC, STE, MD, CN, PTK); Central City Concern, Portland OR (BC, AG, MD); Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland OR (EH, STE, SS); School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland OR (AG, CN); School of Social Work, Portland State University, Portland OR (CN); School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University and Portland State University, Portland OR (PTK); Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (SS).
Meg DevoeFrom the Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Addiction Medicine Section, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR (BC, STE, MD, CN, PTK); Central City Concern, Portland OR (BC, AG, MD); Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland OR (EH, STE, SS); School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland OR (AG, CN); School of Social Work, Portland State University, Portland OR (CN); School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University and Portland State University, Portland OR (PTK); Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (SS).
Christina NicolaidisFrom the Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Addiction Medicine Section, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR (BC, STE, MD, CN, PTK); Central City Concern, Portland OR (BC, AG, MD); Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland OR (EH, STE, SS); School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland OR (AG, CN); School of Social Work, Portland State University, Portland OR (CN); School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University and Portland State University, Portland OR (PTK); Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (SS).
P Todd KorthuisFrom the Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Addiction Medicine Section, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR (BC, STE, MD, CN, PTK); Central City Concern, Portland OR (BC, AG, MD); Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland OR (EH, STE, SS); School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland OR (AG, CN); School of Social Work, Portland State University, Portland OR (CN); School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University and Portland State University, Portland OR (PTK); Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (SS).
Somnath SahaFrom the Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Addiction Medicine Section, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR (BC, STE, MD, CN, PTK); Central City Concern, Portland OR (BC, AG, MD); Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland OR (EH, STE, SS); School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland OR (AG, CN); School of Social Work, Portland State University, Portland OR (CN); School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University and Portland State University, Portland OR (PTK); Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (SS).

Funding

Identifying High Utilizing Patients with Opioid Use Disorder to Engage in Primary CareK23DA053390 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Brian Chan · 2022 to 2026
$886k
AHRQ HHS K12 HS022981NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA053390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is great interest in intensive primary care interventions to address high utilization among medically and socially complex patients. How patients experience these interventions has received less attention.

objectiveTo better understand patients' experience of intensive primary care, we interviewed patients receiving care from the Streamlined Unified Meaningfully Managed Interdisciplinary Team (SUMMIT), an ambulatory intensive care intervention at an urban federally qualified health center.

methodsWe interviewed 25 participants enrolled in the SUMMIT randomized controlled trial and conducted a Reflective Thematic Analysis using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach.

resultsPatients reported high levels of medical and social needs that outstripped prior levels of care and resources. They perceived multiple benefits of SUMMIT through the following themes: 1) Team-based care with improved access to services. Patients appreciated their medical and social needs being met, through higher-level, multidisciplinary care. 2) Caring relationships. Patients described the SUMMIT team as being like family and felt that team members had a genuine sense of duty and obligation toward them. 3) Overcoming stigma. Patients felt valued and treated with dignity. 4) Evolving self-efficacy. Over time, patients experienced increasing success, including engagement in care and improved health behaviors.

conclusionPatients perceived the SUMMIT team as better meeting their health-related needs, compared with traditional primary care. They spoke of the team as family and felt humanized and supported in overcoming barriers to engagement, which led to increased self-efficacy. Evaluations assessing the effectiveness of intensive primary care should measure potential patient-centered benefits beyond short-term utilization and cost reduction.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareIntensive Care UnitsPatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareAdultAgedAmbulatory Care FacilitiesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care TeamCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchDoctor-Patient RelationsHomelessnessIntegrated Health Care SystemsPatient-Centered CarePrimary Health CareSelf EfficacySocial SupportVulnerable Populations

Identifiers

PMID39725468
PMCPMC11960842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.