ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2024
Reaching experts for enhanced referral (REFER) to pain psychology: a modified Delphi approach with multidisciplinary paediatric pain providers at a specialised center in the USA.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exposure-based Interventions for Chronic Pain and Bodily Symptoms: A Special Interest Meeting Report.Behaviour research and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo minimise the referral gap to pain psychology, the purpose of this study was to describe clinician-perceived patient suitability for pain psychology referral, develop a referral plan and outline essential elements of a referral conversation via a modified Delphi approach with multidisciplinary paediatric pain providers.
methodsWe employed a three-round modified Delphi approach consulting multidisciplinary paediatric pain providers (n=18) including physicians, psychologists, physical therapists, occupational therapists and nurse practitioners (PT, OT, NP). Based on the responses to an online survey (Round 1), initial statements regarding the pain psychology referral process were developed. These statements were revised in three separate panels (MD panel, PSY panel, PT, OT, NP panel; Round 2). A priori consensus criteria were verified for each statement within and between groups using anonymous responses to a concluding online survey (Round 3).
resultsApproximately one-third of the statements (35%) reached consensus across all panels. For example, paediatric pain providers agreed that referrals should be communicated verbally, along with written materials, and that pain should be explained early from a biopsychosocial perspective. Paediatric pain providers also suggested minimising barriers through a flexible, stepped-care approach that adapts the delivery of pain psychology beyond traditional models. However, most statements reached consensus in only one or two panels (52%), indicating a lack of consensus across disciplines. The data suggest that it was comparatively easier to reach an overall consensus on statements formulating an ideal referral process to pain psychology (50%) than on statements characterising patient suitability (13%).
conclusionsPaediatric pain providers developed an actionable plan for pain psychology referrals. This plan could bridge referral gaps and improve access to pain psychology treatment. Given the low provider consensus on patient suitability, further research is warranted to understand pain psychology referral decision-making, including differing perceptions of patient suitability across disciplines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.