Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39725442›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Night shift work and prostate cancer: a large cohort study from UK Biobank and Mendelian randomisation study.

Guorong Yang, Yingzi Yang, Kaikai Lv, Yangyang Wu, Tao Song, Qing Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guorong Yang *Senior Department of Urology, the Third Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7444-921X
Yingzi Yang *Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Kaikai LvSenior Department of Urology, the Third Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yangyang WuSenior Department of Urology, the Third Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Tao SongSenior Department of Urology, the Third Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qing YuanSenior Department of Urology, the Third Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China qyuanmd@outlook.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe global concern regarding the health implications of night shift work has escalated. Nevertheless, variations exist in the observed association between night shift work and prostate cancer (PCa). This study aims to systematically explore the association between night shift work and the risk of PCa.

designCohort study and Mendelian randomisation (MR) study were used.

settingCohort study data was from the UK Biobank (UKB). MR study using data was from the Finngen study and UKB through the Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) Open Genome-Wide Association Study Project.

participantsParticipants without prior PCa in paid employment or self-employment were include in the current work schedule cohort, participants without PCa who provided employment history formed the lifetime night shift work cohort.

main outcome measuresThe outcome, incident PCa, was obtained from cancer register through linkage to national cancer databases. National cancer registries centralised information received from separate regional cancer centres around the UK.

resultsA total of 130 853 participants were included in the current work schedule cohort, while the lifetime night shift work cohort comprised 49 511 participants. Over a median follow-up duration of 13.9 years, the current work schedule cohort witnessed 4993 incident cases of PCa, while the lifetime night shift work cohort recorded 2022 PCa cases. In the analysis of the current work schedule, final model showed that no significant association was found between shift work and PCa risk, whether it involved shift but no night shifts (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.08), some night shifts (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.33) and usual night shifts (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.19). In the analysis of the average frequency of night shift work, final model showed no significant impact of different night shift frequencies (<3/month: HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.29; 3-8/month: HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.19; >8/month: HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.07) on the risk of PCa. No significant association was found for either <10 years (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.09) or ≥10 years (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.16) of night shift work. Subsequent subgroup and sensitivity analyses demonstrated consistent results without significant alterations. Furthermore, in the two-sample MR analysis, no statistically significant causal relationship was identified between night shift work and the incidence of PCa.

conclusionIn both the cohort studies and MR analysis, our investigation did not find any association between night shift work and PCa.

Indexed as

Mendelian Randomization AnalysisProstatic NeoplasmsShift Work ScheduleAdultAgedBiological Specimen BanksCohort StudiesGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsUK BiobankUnited KingdomMendelian Randomization AnalysisOCCUPATIONAL & INDUSTRIAL MEDICINEProstate disease

Identifiers

PMID39725442
PMCPMC11683915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.