ArticleBMJ open2024
Nursing home staff's experiences with the implementation of an automated blister packaging system for solid, orally ingestible drugs: a qualitative study in Northern Italy.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore nursing home (NH) staff's experiences implementing an automated blister packaging system for solid, orally ingestible drugs.
designThis was a descriptive qualitative study. Semistructured interviews were used for data collection, and qualitative content analysis was applied for data analysis.
settingFour NHs in a region in Northern Italy participated in the piloting of an automated blister packaging system.
participantsThe purposive sample comprised 40 NH staff (seven registered nurses, 11 certified nursing assistants, three nursing aids, seven nursing managers, four directors and eight physicians)
resultsSix main categories emerged from the data analysis: (1) impacting safety, including improved medication process, perceived insecurities and remaining error sources; (2) creating free spaces, including time, individualised care and drug storage and logistics; (3) serving residents, (4) meeting expectations, including met and unmet expectations; (5) generating efforts and (6) producing waste. They all merged into one theme 'It pays off!'
conclusionsAs experienced by NH staff, the automated blister packaging system improved medication safety and reduced the workload of registered nurses, but it is not an 'all-around carefree package'. Continuous quality improvement and risk management strategies are recommended to accompany and sustain implementation, as well as further clarification of roles and duties among the different care workers involved in medication management. Further research is needed to gain a better understanding of the impact of an automated blister packaging system on registered nurses' competencies in NHs regarding medication management and residents' therapies and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.