ArticleBMJ open2024
Implementation and impact of NHS-funded tobacco dependence services in England: a mixed-method evaluation protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTobacco smoking remains a leading cause of ill-health, premature mortality and a driver of health inequalities. To support smokers in England, a comprehensive approach to treating tobacco dependence is being implemented. This includes offering support to all people admitted to hospitals, as well as women and pregnant people within NHS settings. We aim to describe the protocol for an evaluation of this tobacco-dependence service. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a national evaluation across five regions in England (i.e., South West, West Midlands, Greater Manchester, North East and North Cumbria, Yorkshire and Humber) including 11 NHS Foundation Trusts. It is funded from September 2021 to September 2025. Evaluation settings are acute hospital, maternity and inpatient mental health.Work package (WP) 1 involves qualitative key informant interviews to characterise the policy implementation context. WP 2 involves an online survey to assess the routinisation of the service in practice and staff attitudes regarding tobacco dependence, plus in-depth interviews with relevant practitioners to explore survey findings and interviews with smokers to investigate its usefulness and impact. WP 3 involves descriptive statistical analysis of routinely collected data to assess service uptake and impact on health and care outcomes (e.g., smoking status). WP 4 involves an economic analysis of routinely collected data to determine the financial impact of the service. Qualitative data (WP 1, WP 2) will be analysed using Thematic Analysis and Framework Analysis, respectively. WP 2 survey data will be analysed using descriptive statistics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This evaluation received favourable ethical opinion from Newcastle University (17756/2021) and NHS Wales Research Ethics Committee (22/WA/0203). It has also received Confidentiality Advisory Group support (22CAG0103).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.