ArticleBMJ open2024
Specialist clinical pathways in audiology services for adults living with coexisting hearing loss and dementia: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBoth hearing loss and dementia are associated with ageing, and it is thought that many individuals living with dementia also live with hearing loss. Despite the large comorbidity between these two disorders, there remains a clear lack of established guidelines in audiological services for assessing and managing patients living with dementia. This scoping review aims to examine whether specialist clinical pathways exist in audiology services for people living with coexisting hearing loss and dementia and to describe the specific components and features of these pathways. This review will provide up-to-date information on clinical practice, identifying any gaps in care and in the literature to inform future research hypotheses and best practice guidelines. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The methods are reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. The following electronic databases will be searched: CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. The eligibility criteria are defined according to the domains of the SPIDER (Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation and Research type) search strategy tool. Primary research studies and select grey literature sources (eg, practice guidelines) will be eligible if published within the last 15 years. Studies eligible for inclusion must contain adults living with suspected or confirmed dementia, their carers, or clinicians within audiology services. Initial searches were performed on 31 January 2024 and will be updated before completion and submission of the review. Article quality will be appraised using an established tool: the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The results will be synthesised and reported in line with reflexive thematic analysis guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical issues are foreseen as the review will collect secondary data only. Findings will be reported by peer-reviewed publication and by national and international academic conferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.