ArticleBMJ open2024
HINODE study: haemophilia A in infancy and newborns - protocol for a prospective, multicentre, observational study evaluating the coagulation potential and safety of emicizumab prophylaxis.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emicizumab prophylaxis in a preterm infant with severe hemophilia A: a case report on the feasibility of early use.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Genetically confirmed severe hemophilia A in a preterm infant: a case report.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEmicizumab prophylaxis is approved for people of all ages with haemophilia A (HA) including infants and children. Although previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of emicizumab in infants with HA, real-world data on emicizumab use in infants are limited. The Haemophilia A in Infancy and NewbOrns: multi-instituional prospective observational study to assess the efficacy anD safety of Emicizumab (HINODE) study aims to evaluate the coagulation potential and safety of emicizumab prophylaxis in infants with congenital HA from birth to <12 months of age. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, observational study conducted in Japan in infants with congenital HA aged <12 months who are receiving or are scheduled to receive prophylactic emicizumab at an approved dosing regimen: 1.5 mg/kg weekly, 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or 6 mg/kg every 4 weeks. The target inclusion is 50 infants. The primary endpoint is to evaluate the relationship between global coagulation test parameters (using clot waveform analysis and thrombin generation assay) and plasma emicizumab concentrations in infants aged from 6 to <12 months. Secondary endpoints include evaluating coagulation profiles in infants aged <6 months and changes between the age of <6 and 6 to <12 months. Additionally, coagulation parameters will be evaluated with the in vitro addition of anti-idiotype antibodies against emicizumab or the addition of a factor VIII product in infants aged from 6 to <12 months. The study will also evaluate adverse events and bleeds. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the MINS Clinical Trial Review Committee (no. 230214) and will be conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the Act on the Protection of Personal Information and the Guidance of Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Biological Research Involving Human Subjects. Written informed consent for participation in the study will be obtained from a legally acceptable representative. Results will be published in scientific/medical journals and presented at international congresses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials; jRCT1031230264.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.