Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39724913›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025

Analysis of eligibility criteria clusters based on large language models for clinical trial design.

Alban Bornet, Philipp Khlebnikov, Florian Meer, Quentin Haas, Anthony Yazdani, Boya Zhang, Poorya Amini, Douglas Teodoro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alban BornetDepartment of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7266-627X
Philipp KhlebnikovRisklick AG, 3013 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3559-2144
Florian MeerRisklick AG, 3013 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0009-6610-202X
Quentin HaasRisklick AG, 3013 Bern, Switzerland.
Anthony YazdaniDepartment of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3309-6128
Boya ZhangDepartment of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4439-8212
Poorya AminiRisklick AG, 3013 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9473-0172
Douglas TeodoroDepartment of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6238-4503

Funding

CTxAI: quality by design of clinical studies using explainable AISwiss Innovation Agency Innosuisse 101.466 IP-ICT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesClinical trials (CTs) are essential for improving patient care by evaluating new treatments' safety and efficacy. A key component in CT protocols is the study population defined by the eligibility criteria. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) in encoding eligibility criterion information to support CT-protocol design. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe extracted eligibility criterion sections, phases, conditions, and interventions from CT protocols available in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry. Eligibility sections were split into individual rules using a criterion tokenizer and embedded using LLMs. The obtained representations were clustered. The quality and relevance of the clusters for protocol design was evaluated through 3 experiments: intrinsic alignment with protocol information and human expert cluster coherence assessment, extrinsic evaluation through CT-level classification tasks, and eligibility section generation.

resultsSentence embeddings fine-tuned using biomedical corpora produce clusters with the highest alignment to CT-level information. Human expert evaluation confirms that clusters are well structured and coherent. Despite the high information compression, clusters retain significant CT information, up to 97% of the classification performance obtained with raw embeddings. Finally, eligibility sections automatically generated using clusters achieve 95% of the ROUGE scores obtained with a generative LLM prompted with CT-protocol details, suggesting that clusters encapsulate information useful to CT-protocol design. DISCUSSION: Clusters derived from sentence-level LLM embeddings effectively summarize complex eligibility criterion data while retaining relevant CT-protocol details. Clustering-based approaches provide a scalable enhancement in CT design that balances information compression with accuracy.

conclusionsClustering eligibility criteria using LLM embeddings provides a practical and efficient method to summarize critical protocol information. We provide an interactive visualization of the pipeline here.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicEligibility DeterminationNatural Language ProcessingPatient SelectionResearch DesignClinical Trial Protocols as TopicCluster AnalysisHumansLarge Language Modelsclinical trialsclusteringeligibility criteriaLLMsnatural language processing (NLP)topic modeling

Identifiers

PMID39724913
PMCPMC11833473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.