Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39724565›Full record

Trial reportKidney3602024

Efficacy and Safety of Nefecon in Patients with IgA Nephropathy from Mainland China: 2-Year NefIgArd Trial Results.

Hong Zhang, Richard Lafayette, Bei Wang, Lisa Ying, Zhengying Zhu, Andrew Stone, Jens Kristensen, Jonathan Barratt

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Kidney360, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Renal failure · 2026
    Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hong ZhangRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University Institute of Nephrology, Beijing, China.
Richard LafayetteDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0003-3906-7934
Bei WangEverest Medicines Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Lisa YingEverest Medicines Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Zhengying ZhuEverest Medicines Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Andrew StoneStone Biostatistics Ltd., Crewe, United Kingdom.
Jens KristensenJDK Pharmaconsulting, Espergarde, Denmark.
Jonathan BarrattThe Mayer IgA Nephropathy Laboratories, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9063-7229

Funding

Calliditas Therapeutics, Everest Medicines
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: IgA nephropathy (IgAN), an immune-mediated kidney disease, is particularly prevalent among individuals of East Asian ancestry. Nefecon is a novel, oral, targeted-release budesonide formulation designed to inhibit galactose-deficient IgA1 formation underlying IgAN pathophysiology. We present findings in patients with IgAN from mainland China participating in the 2-year, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 NefIgArd trial of nefecon. Methods: Patients (aged 18 years and older) with primary IgAN (eGFR 35–90 ml/min per 1.73 m2, persistent proteinuria [urine protein–creatinine ratio ≥0.8 g/g or proteinuria ≥1 g/24 hours] despite optimized renin-angiotensin system blockade) received nefecon or placebo over 9 months, followed by a 15-month follow-up phase on supportive care alone. The primary efficacy end point was time-weighted average of eGFR over 2 years. Results: Sixty-two patients from mainland China were included in this prespecified analysis. The primary efficacy end point was 9.6 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (95% confidence interval, 2.0 to 19.8) in favor of nefecon versus placebo. This was consistent with (and numerically greater than) that of the global study population. Time to confirmed 30% eGFR reduction or kidney failure from baseline was substantially delayed with nefecon (patients with an event: 9%) versus placebo (30%; hazard ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.04 to 0.73). No deaths were reported in the China cohort. In the nefecon group, treatment-emergent serious adverse events were reported by one patient during treatment and two patients during follow-up (versus no patients and seven patients, respectively, in the placebo group). No severe infections requiring hospitalization were reported. Conclusions: Nefecon treatment for 9 months showed greater preservation of eGFR over 2 years compared with placebo. The efficacy outcomes were consistent with global study results, with a numerically greater treatment benefit observed in patients from China. Nefecon was well tolerated, with no unexpected safety signals.

Indexed as

Glomerulonephritis, IGAAdultChinaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedProteinuriaTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39724565
PMCPMC11687989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.