Trial reportMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2025
Importance of pain perception after mucogingival surgery in multiple Miller class III/RT2 gingival recessions: A randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough postoperative pain after mucogingival surgery can modify the patient's daily life, few studies have compared daily postoperative pain in mucogingival surgery considering patient characteristics. The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative pain in 24 patients with Miller class III/RT2 multiple recessions treated with the modified VISTA (m-VISTA) versus the coronally advanced flap (CAF) with a connective tissue graft (CTG). MATERIAL AND
methodsData related to pain intensity (PI), pain duration (PD), analgesic drug intake (AI), and time of analgesic need (TAN) were collected in the "UPV/EHU pain diary". Other data were also evaluated such as the patient's central sensitization level, pre-surgical pain, dimensions of CTG, and postoperative incidences were included. A descriptive and analytical statistical analysis was performed.
resultsPI (m-VISTA = 11.19 vs. CAF = 8.10) and PD (m-VISTA = 25.27 min. vs. CAF = 10.34 min.) were higher in the test group, being statistically significant at 2 and 8 hours. TAN (m-VISTA = 63.58 min. vs. CAF = 53.25 min.) was higher in the test group, while AI was two times higher in the control group (m-VISTA = 15 vs. CAF = 38). An association was observed between PI and both the length of the SCTG and drugs/alcohol consumption.
conclusionsPostoperative pain was greater in the group of patients treated with m-VISTA. However, these patients showed a higher number of risk factors which might have increased or modified their pain symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.