ArticleMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2025
Is the mandibular buccal shelf anatomy related to craniofacial morphology? A cross-sectional CBCT study.
Article in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anatomical Variations of the Mandibular Buccal Shelf According to Sex, Facial Biotype, and Root Reference: A CBCT Study.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe placement of Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs) in the mandibular buccal shelf area is a common option for distalizing the lower arch. Therefore, the study of bone thickness and depth in this area is mandatory before planning TAD insertion. The aim of this study was to quantify the width and depth of the mandibular buccal shelf structure and examine its associations with sex, age, skeletal class and vertical pattern. MATERIAL AND
methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out on cone beam computed tomographies obtained from 91 patients. The bone thickness was evaluated in the mandibular buccal shelf area 5 and 8 mm apical to the cement-enamel junction (CEJ), and the bone depth was measured 4 mm buccal to the CEJ at the level of the distal root of the mandibular first molar and the mesial root of the mandibular second molar using the InVivoDental 6.0 software.
resultsThe depth and thickness of the bone increased in distal areas, and the thickness was greater at 8 mm. No differences were found between sex or skeletal class. Bone thickness decreased with age, and it was significantly lower in hyperdivergent patients.
conclusionsThe thickness of the bone was higher in distal and deeper areas, and the depth was greater in distal areas. The hyperdivergent facial pattern and age were negatively associated with bone thickness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.