ReviewThe Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons2025
Advances in Imaging of Traumatic Nerve Injuries.
Review in The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Serum Biomarkers for Traumatic Peripheral Nerve Injury: A Systematic Review.Muscle & nerve · 2025Pooled it
- Investigating the diagnostic accuracy of physical examination in digital nerve injury: a study within a trial.The Journal of hand surgery, European volume · 2026Trial
- Recovery Patterns After Epineuroclasis and Endoneuroclasis Stretch Injuries in the Rat Median Nerve.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Review
- Traumatic Upper Extremity Nerve Lesions in Children: High-Resolution Nerve Ultrasound Can Improve Surgical Outcome.Journal of brachial plexus and peripheral nerve injury · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traumatic peripheral nerve injuries represent a spectrum of conditions and remain challenging to diagnose and prognosticate. High-resolution ultrasonography and magnetic resonance neurography have emerged as useful diagnostic modalities in the evaluation of traumatic peripheral nerve and brachial plexus injuries. Ultrasonography is noninvasive, is able to rapidly interrogate large areas and multiple nerves, allows for a dynamic assessment of nerves and their surrounding anatomy, and is cost-effective. It allows for the prompt differentiation of neurotmetic versus axonotmetic traumatic nerve injuries, which informs surgical decision making. Magnetic resonance neurography yields images of peripheral nerves with high structural resolution down to the level of fascicles, is able to evaluate difficult anatomic areas that may not be reached by ultrasonography, and can detect signs of acute and chronic muscle denervation. Advanced preclinical techniques, such as second-harmonic generation microscopy, use multiphoton microscopy to visualize the internal collagenous structure of peripheral nerves, while third-harmonic generation microscopy can image myelin. One potential future application for multiphoton microscopy is the in vivo real-time assessment of nervous tissue. Near-infrared fluorescence also has the potential to assist with intraoperative peripheral nerve identification and assessment of pathology, but many challenges remain in identifying or designing the ideal contrast agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.