ArticleVeterinary research communications2024
Main pre-slaughter factors affecting carcass bruising and meat quality in beef cattle.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the prevalence of carcass bruising in Simmental cross-breed bulls and to characterize the bruises in terms of number, size, shape, severity, and the affected region of the carcass. In addition, the risk factors related to the pre-harvested and harvested phase of beef production and meat quality parameters, as well, were investigated. The prevalence of bruised carcasses was 40.6% (95% confidence interval, CI = 35.4-46.0%). The main risk factors related to carcass bruising were procurement of the bulls from the auction markets (odds ratio, OR = 2.94, 95% CI = 1.65-5.26) compared to the bulls that came directly from the farms and inadequate practice in the combined type of slaughterhouses (type A: OR = 6.86, 95% CI = 3.53-13.37; type B: OR = 4.76, 95% CI = 2.26-10.01) relative to the beef-only slaughterhouses (P = 0.0001). Out of the total investigated bruises, 40.7% were severe, affecting muscular parts and mainly localized on the rear parts of the carcasses. The probability of severe bruises was higher in bulls with at least one large-sized bruise than in bulls without bruises of that size (OR = 3.10, 95% CI = 1.42-6.78, P = 0.005). Concerning the risk factors, the dark cutting occurrence was significantly lower in the bull's carcasses originating from the farms and completely absent in beef-only slaughterhouses (P = 0.001). Improvement of facilities and equipment, avoiding transport through markets, and training of staff in terms of animal welfare are crucial in obtaining a concept of safe and better quality food.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39724473What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.