ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2025
When Should Colon Cancer Screening Begin? The Impact of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer and the Reality of an Unscreened Older Population.
Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Burden and Forecast of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer (1990-2038) in Five East Asian Populations: A Systematic Analysis Based on the GBD 2023 Study.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- A Clinicopathologic, Molecular, and Prognostic Comparison Between Early- and Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer in Korea: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- When the carcinogenic window opens before the screening window: the age-threshold blind spot in early-onset colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Global, regional, and national trends in colorectal cancer from 2010 to 2021: an analysis of the global burden of disease study 2021.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent increases in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality under age 50 have led the US to recommend starting screening at age 45 years instead of 50. Several other countries are now also reconsidering the age to start CRC screening.
aimsTo aid decision makers in making an informed decision about lowering the starting age of CRC screening in their jurisdictions.
methodsIn this article, we present the clinical and modeling evidence for the optimal age to start CRC screening and provide a checklist of considerations for decisions on age to start CRC screening.
resultsTwo observational studies showed that detection of advanced neoplasia in those aged 45-49 years undergoing colonoscopy was at least as high as in those aged 50-54 years. One Taiwanese study reported a 22% reduction in CRC incidence and a 39% reduction in CRC mortality from FIT screening in those 40-49 years compared to those 50 years and older. Nine modeling studies concluded that lowering the age to start screening to age 45 was cost-effective. However, lowering the start age can have negative spill-off effects, such as increased wait times for diagnostic colonoscopy for symptomatic individuals and decreased screening participation. In an effort to support decision making and prevent negative spill-off, the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Network in Canada proposed a Worksheet to determine the resource impact of earlier screening initiation.
conclusionsLowering the age to start CRC screening to 45 years likely leads to a reduction in CRC incidence and mortality but requires additional healthcare resources. Policy makers can use the worksheet to assess the expected increase and assess the feasibility within their jurisdictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39724471What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.