ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2024
One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification Analysis of Sentinel Nodes in Endometrial Cancer Versus Ultrastaging: First Long-Term Follow-Up Data of Discordant Cases.
Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsEndometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological cancer worldwide and its incidence is rising. The cornerstone of its management is surgical treatment with nodal staging. A monocentric study investigating the potential of the molecular biology method of one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) in sentinel lymph node (SLN) analysis was conducted at our institution between April 2016 and January 2018. Histopathological ultrastaging was used as the reference standard for SLN examination and OSNA as the index test. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcome of patients with discordant SLN and OSNA results. To our knowledge, this is the first study exploring this issue. METHODS AND
resultsPatients were followed in line with the current ESMO/ESGO/ESTRO recommendations. The institutional electronic database was retrospectively searched for patients' follow-up data from April 2016 till March 2023. Only patients who provided a written valid consent and had a positive OSNA and negative ultrastaging of their SLN analysis were included in the study. The primary endpoint was the retrospective analysis of their clinical outcome. Data from 58 patients enrolled into our previous study were reviewed and 12 discordant patients who met the inclusion criteria for this study were identified. The median follow-up was 83 months. Disease recurrence was detected in 3 (25%) patients, two of these were nodal and both patients died. One patient had a solitary lung metastasis which was surgically treated, and the patient was disease-free during the whole study period.
conclusionThe recurrence rate of patients included in the study was in the intermediate-high and high-risk group range, and hence, higher than expected based on ultrastaging results. Furthermore, benign epithelial inclusions do not seem to adversely affect OSNA SLN analysis in EC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.