Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39724439›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025

Effects of acute hydration changes on cardiovascular magnetic resonance native T1 and T2 mapping.

Katrine Aagaard Myhr, Emel Keceli, Joakim Bo Kunkel, Charlotte Burup Kristensen, Niels Vejlstrup, Lars Køber, Redi Pecini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katrine Aagaard MyhrDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 7, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark. katrine.aagaard.myhr.01@regionh.dk.
Emel KeceliDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 7, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.
Joakim Bo KunkelDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 7, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.
Charlotte Burup KristensenDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 7, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.
Niels VejlstrupDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 7, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.
Lars KøberDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 7, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.
Redi PeciniDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 7, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes in hydration status may affect myocardial native T1 and T2 values and influence the clinical interpretation. We aimed to assess the impact of acute preload augmentation on native T1 and T2. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) native T1 and T2 mapping were performed twice on the same day in 20 healthy participants before and after an acute preload augmentation by a 2-liter intravenous infusion of isotonic sodium chloride (0.9%). Test-retest reproducibility was evaluated in 30 healthy participants with two consecutive CMR examinations on the same day. Sixteen participants were included in both substudies. In the 20 healthy participants undergoing acute preload augmentation (55% males, mean age (interquartile range [IQR]) 43 [29-51] years), native T1 increased with 17 ms (95% confidence interval [CI] 7 to 26; p = 0.001), T2 with 1.7 ms (95% CI 0.8 to 2.4; p < 0.001), and blood T1 with 46 ms (95% CI 28 to 65; p < 0.001). Test-retest variability in 30 healthy participants (47% males, median age 43 [28-52] years) showed 95% limits of agreement (LOA) of ± 26 ms for native T1, ± 2.1 ms for T2, and ± 57 ms for blood T1. In the 16 participants included in both substudies, the mean differences in changes post-infusion versus test-retest were 22 ms (95% CI 8 to 36; p = 0.01) for native T1, 1.9 ms (95% CI 0.9 to 2.9; p = 0.001) for T2, and 62 ms (95% CI 32 to 91; p < 0.001) for blood T1. Native T1 and T2 values increased following acute preload augmentation. However, the changes were within the 95% LOA of the test-retest reproducibility.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, CineOrganism Hydration StatusSaline SolutionVentricular Function, LeftWater-Electrolyte BalanceAdultFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsSaline SolutionCardiovascular magnetic resonanceHydration statusNative T1 mappingT2 mapping

Identifiers

PMID39724439
PMCPMC11811469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.