Observational studyIrish journal of medical science2025
The clinical significance and burden of thyroid nodules discovered incidentally.
Observational study in Irish journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reappraisal of the clinical significance and burden of thyroid nodules discovered incidentally in thyroidology.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe majority of thyroid nodules are benign; however current guidelines suggest that thyroid incidentalomas should be appropriately evaluated to rule out malignancy.
aimsThis study aims to determine the incidence of thyroid incidentalomas and the likelihood that they harbour sinister pathology in the largest Irish cohort studied to-date.
methodsA retrospective observational chart review was conducted using data from July 2018 to December 2018 using the Radiology Database in use at Cork University Hospital. The text of 1000 imaging reports (500 carotid Doppler and 500 computed tomography thorax) was manually screened for phrases such as "thyroid mass" or "thyroid nodule".
resultsOn 1000 scans, 14 (1.4%) thyroid incidentalomas were discovered. The occurrence of incidentalomas by imaging was 2/500 (0.4%) for ultrasound and 12/500 (2.4%) for computed tomography. Three of these nodules (21.4%) were further evaluated with a subsequent ultrasound and due to a size of more than 1 cm underwent fine needle aspiration. Using the Thy classification, all three were given a Thy 2 (non-neoplastic) grading.
conclusionThis study found that there was no clinical benefit to reporting the presence of thyroid incidentalomas incidentally noted on radiology investigations. Although the overall percentage of thyroid incidentalomas is low, this number may be enough to cause unnecessary strain on the healthcare system and burden patients with invasive investigations in addition to causing unnecessary anxiety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39724405What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.