Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39724402›Full record

SynthesisEpileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape2025

Ictal semiology in temporo-frontal epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Irina Oane, Andrei Barborica, Ioana Mîndruţă

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Ictal semiology in lateral temporal epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Ictal semiology in temporo-frontal epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Irina OaneNeurology Department, Epilepsy Monitoring Unit, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3796-0676
Andrei BarboricaPhysics Department, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6783-3769
Ioana MîndruţăNeurology Department, Epilepsy Monitoring Unit, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9329-5132

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed a systematic review of the ictal semiology of temporo-frontal seizures with the aim to summarize the state-of-the-art anatomo-clinical correlations in the field, and help guide the interpretation of ictal semiology within the framework of presurgical evaluation. We conducted the systematic review and meta-analysis, and reported its results according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. We searched electronic databases (Scopus, PUBMED, Web of Science, and EMBASE) using relevant keywords related to temporal, frontal and sublobar structures, semiology, and electroencephalography/stereoelectroencephalography exploration. The risk of bias was evaluated using the QUADAS2. We included articles in English, reporting the seizure semiology of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy with temporal-frontal involvement and patients with frontal lobe epilepsy and fronto-temporal network involved. We performed hierarchical cluster analysis to determine signs and symptoms associated with the temporo-frontal epileptogenic network for all patients and for each subgroup (frontal/temporal seizure onset). Fisher exact test was performed to evaluate the difference in seizure freedom and clinical sign/symptom occurrence in patients that underwent unilobar versus bilobar resection. Meta-analysis on the prevalence of temporo-frontal/fronto-temporal involvement applying a random-effect model was used. We included 40 articles and we extracted data from 109 patients. The meta-analysis showed the total prevalence of temporo-frontal/fronto-temporal network involvement was 19.75%, CI 12.02-27.47, high heterogeneity (82.71%). For the whole group and subgroups, the main cluster of clinical manifestations is emotional, autonomic, cognitive, grimace, hyperkinetic (association coefficient higher than .6). Elementary motor semiology is significantly associated with multilobar resection (p = .022 whole group and p = .0012 fronto-temporal subgroup). Fifty-eight patients were seizure-free after surgery. There was no significant difference between seizure freedom in uni versus bilobar resections (p = .28). Seizures involving temporo-frontal/fronto-temporal network usually manifest with a cluster of signs and symptoms: emotional, autonomic, grimace, cognitive and hyperkinetic behavior. Based on semiology, one cannot distinguish between fronto-temporal and temporo-frontal cases at individual patient level. In those patients undergoing a surgical procedure, elementary motor seizure semiology is significantly associated with multilobar resection.

Indexed as

Epilepsy, Frontal LobeEpilepsy, Temporal LobeSeizuresElectroencephalographyHumansanatomo‐clinical correlationepilepsy surgeryictal semiologySEEGsystematic reviewtemporo‐frontal epilepsy

Identifiers

PMID39724402
PMCPMC12067355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.