Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39724375›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Maternal and Infant Health Outcomes in US-Born and Non-US-Born Black Pregnant People in the US.

Mariah Jiles, Ndola Prata, Kim G Harley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Clinical risk factors and adverse perinatal outcomes among U.S. and African-born Black women in California.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mariah JilesCenter of Excellence in Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, University of California, Berkeley.
Ndola PrataCenter of Excellence in Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, University of California, Berkeley.
Kim G HarleyCenter of Excellence in Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, University of California, Berkeley.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: With disparate Black maternal health outcomes in the US and a steadily expanding non-US-born Black population, it is beneficial to investigate Black maternal health outcomes by country of origin. Objective: To compare the prevalence of maternal morbidity and infant birth outcomes between US-born and non-US-born Black populations in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included all registered hospital births in the US from the 2021 National Vital Statistics Systems (NVSS) Natality Data. Eligible patients identified as Black, excluding those who were younger than 15 years, gave birth to twins or multiple infants, gave birth outside of a hospital, or were missing data for maternal morbidity, nativity, or study covariates. Exposures: Maternal birthplace, characterized as born within the US or born outside of the US. Main Outcomes and Measures: Five maternal morbidities (ie, maternal transfusion, perineal laceration, ruptured uterus, unplanned hysterectomy, admission to intensive care unit) and two birth outcomes (low birthweight, preterm birth). Logistic regression analyses were utilized to calculate the associations of maternal morbidity and adverse birth outcome with maternal birthplace. Results: Of a total 3 669 928 registered births in the US in 2021, 499 409 births to mothers who identified as Black were included in analysis; the majority of individuals were aged 20 to 24 years (117 173 [23.5%]), 25 to 29 years (142 890 [28.6%]), or 30 to 34 years (123 485 [24.7%]). Maternal birthplace in the US was associated with a decreased odds of experiencing any maternal morbidity (4411 of 403 822 births [1.1%]) compared with Black people born outside of the US (1593 of 95 587 births [1.7%]) (aOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.62-0.71). US-born Black people were significantly less likely to experience 3 of 5 maternal morbidities compared with non-US-born Black people: maternal transfusion (aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.97), perineal laceration (aOR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.39-0.48), and ruptured uterus (aOR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45-0.89). US-born Black people also had a nonsignificant decrease in odds for unplanned hysterectomy (aOR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.56-1.05) and admission to intensive care unit (aOR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.79-1.07). However, they were at increased odds of experiencing key adverse infant health outcomes, including low birthweight (aOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.58-1.67) and preterm birth (aOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.47-1.55). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, significant differences were observed in odds of maternal morbidity and birth outcomes by maternal birthplace within the Black pregnant population in the US. This suggests the need for increased assessment of nativity in Black maternal health research and specific strategies to reduce morbidity for non-US-born populations.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanBlack PeopleInfant HealthMaternal HealthAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePremature Birth

Identifiers

PMID39724375
PMCPMC11672153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.