Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39724360›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2025

Management of Horizontal Cleavage Meniscus Tears.

Zachary R Burnett, David C Flanigan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zachary R BurnettDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 2835 Fred Taylor Dr. Suite 2200, Columbus, OH, 43202, USA.
David C FlaniganDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 2835 Fred Taylor Dr. Suite 2200, Columbus, OH, 43202, USA. David.flanigan@osumc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe management of horizontal cleavage meniscus tears (HCT) has evolved in recent years. Historically, HCTs have been treated with partial meniscectomy, but multiple studies have shown the long-term risks of development of arthritic changes in the knee following meniscectomy. These findings have renewed interest in meniscal preservation whenever possible, even in older patients not previously considered for meniscus repair. This article provides an overview of current management of horizontal cleavage meniscus tears and describes modern surgical techniques for repair of HCTs. RECENT

findingsCurrent research studies have continued to emphasize the benefits of meniscal preservation on long-term function. Recent data has demonstrated similar success rates following repair of HCTs compared to repair of other types of meniscus tears. Additionally, multiple recent studies have demonstrated the potential benefit of biologic augmentation in decreasing failure rate after meniscal repair. Modern surgical techniques and biologic augmentation have improved outcomes of meniscal repair. However, consideration of a patient's individual goals, activity level, and expectation are important to achieve a successful outcome regardless of treatment modality. While not every patient is a candidate for meniscal repair, current data has shown it should be considered for a growing number of patients.

Indexed as

Horizontal cleavage tearMeniscusMeniscus repair

Identifiers

PMID39724360
PMCPMC11889320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.