ArticleCardiovascular engineering and technology2025
A Novel Transcatheter Posterior Ventricular Anchoring Neochordoplasty Mitral Valve Repair Device.
Article in Cardiovascular engineering and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endoscopic mitral valve repair-one hundred and one ways to use neochords: a narrative review.Journal of visualized surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAdvancements in minimally invasive technologies to decrease postoperative morbidity and recovery times represent a large opportunity for mitral valve repair operations. However, current technologies are unable to replicate gold standard surgical neochord implantation.
methodsWe developed a novel neochordal repair device, Minimally Invasive Ventricular Anchoring Neochordoplasty (MIVAN), which operates via transcatheter, trans-septal anchoring to the posterior ventricular wall. We evaluated MIVAN in an ex vivo heart simulator and compared it with surgical neochordal repair and MitraClip using a prolapse model.
resultsUpon MIVAN repair of the model (n = 5), regurgitant fraction was reduced from 19.46 ± 1.77% to 7.30 ± 0.99% (p = 0.01). Surgical neochordal repair reduced regurgitant fraction to 5.65 ± 0.66%, but there was no significant difference between MIVAN and surgical repair (p = 0.22). Unpaired MitraClip repair had significantly higher regurgitant fraction of 11.9 ± 1.40%, compared with those of neochord (p < 0.01) and MIVAN (p = 0.03) repairs.
conclusionsMIVAN represents a high-value opportunity for minimally invasive mitral valve repair. The benefits of the percutaneous, trans-septal approach for implantation on the posterior ventricular wall necessitate the expanded exploration of this device as a treatment alternative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39724314What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.